From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R4ESC-0002Af-23 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:06:20 +0200 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R4ENC-0007Ge-KA for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:01:10 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:01:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <201109151120.09382.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> References: <1316081269.4523.54.camel@mattotaupa> <201109151120.09382.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1316102470.3510.0.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: How to call the old repository: oe.dev or OE classic? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:06:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 11:20 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > oe-dev/oe.dev being a shortened "org.openembedded.dev" is kind of a relic of > the old (was it bitkeeper or monotone?) days prior to git. The benefit of > "classic" is it draws attention to the fact that it's deprecated, whereas to > me, dev implies that's where development still occurs. So my personal vote is > for OE-classic. Agreed. Or even "OE-legacy" or something. p.