Re: Rename BTRfs to MuchSlowerFS ?

[Maciej Marcin Piechotka <uzytkownik2@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1139 bytes --]

On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 05:16 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Felix Blanke <felixblanke@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm using btrfs since one year now and it's quite fast. I don't feel any
> > differences to other filesystems. Never tried a benchmark but for my daily
> > work it's nice.
> 
> Your workload must be light :)
> 

I recently repeatedly rsync whole partitions (>30GB) without ill
effects. (ok - first sync took whole 1s).

> >
> > The advantage to ext4 for me is the build in raid1 and the snapshots. I'm
> > using the snapshot feature for my local backups. I like it because it's
> > really easy and uses very few storage. A simple "Snapshot -> Rsync to a
> > different disk -> Snapshot" script is the perfect local backup method.
> >
> 
> you've never used zfs have you :)
> 
> For that purpose, think "same feature as btrfs snapshot + rsync" but
> without needing rsync. This can be very useful as the process of rsync
> determining what data to transfer can be quite CPU/disk intensive.

Now I'm curious - how do zsf get data off the partition without rsync?

Regards

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]