From: jon.medhurst@linaro.org (Jon Medhurst (Tixy))
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [ltt-dev] LTTng 2.0 on ARM
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 15:34:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1316270082.3681.20.camel@computer2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110916162507.GB2100@arm.com>
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 17:25 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 05:27:08PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> > This is the same issue I found recently with kprobes [1]. There is also
> > an inconsistency as function symbols in loadable module do have bit zero
> > set, but if the module is built-in then bit zero is clear.
>
> Does that mean that some different infrastructure is used to get the module
> symbols compared with kallsyms?
Yes, there's different infrastructure to handle symbols in loadable
modules compared to those in the kernel binary. I mentioned this in [1],
or in your Linaro inbox on 29th Aug ;-)
> That feels nasty -- they should at least
> be consistent...
I agree, getting them consistent would solve half the problem.
--
Tixy
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg138283.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-17 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4E68559A.8080204@linaro.org>
[not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP86E263003FB9999131E2A196000@phx.gbl>
[not found] ` <4E6E4250.2000309@linaro.org>
[not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP6FB53F86865C7F0175B0D96020@phx.gbl>
[not found] ` <4E6F3B93.5050603@linaro.org>
[not found] ` <BLU0-SMTP720ADD6D0D065018E5C97196050@phx.gbl>
2011-09-13 17:44 ` [ltt-dev] LTTng 2.0 on ARM Rabin Vincent
2011-09-14 10:09 ` Dave Martin
2011-09-14 16:27 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2011-09-16 16:25 ` Dave Martin
2011-09-17 14:34 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1316270082.3681.20.camel@computer2 \
--to=jon.medhurst@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.