From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] futex: Reduce hash bucket lock contention
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:37:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1316417840.10174.46.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E749937.5090803@colorfullife.com>
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:57 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> How do we verify that everything is able to deal with spurious
> wakeups?
>
Well, I could go audit all 1400+ *schedule*() callsites in the kernel.
Or we can rely on the fact that current code can already cause spurious
wakeups due to signals.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-19 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-14 13:30 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] delayed wakeup list Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 13:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] sched: Provide " Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 13:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 14:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-09-14 14:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 15:35 ` Darren Hart
2011-09-14 15:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 15:49 ` Darren Hart
2011-09-16 7:59 ` Paul Turner
2011-09-16 7:59 ` Paul Turner
2011-09-16 8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-02 14:01 ` Manfred Spraul
2011-10-03 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 13:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] futex: Reduce hash bucket lock contention Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 15:46 ` Darren Hart
2011-09-14 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 16:00 ` Darren Hart
2011-09-14 20:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-16 12:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-17 12:57 ` Manfred Spraul
2011-09-19 7:37 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-09-19 8:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 13:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] ipc/sem: Rework wakeup scheme Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-15 17:29 ` Manfred Spraul
2011-09-15 19:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-15 19:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-15 19:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-17 12:36 ` Manfred Spraul
2011-09-16 12:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-17 12:32 ` Manfred Spraul
2011-09-16 12:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 13:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] delayed wakeup list Eric Dumazet
2011-09-14 13:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1316417840.10174.46.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.