From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xemul@parallels.com,
paul@paulmenage.org, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, daniel.lezcano@free.fr,
mingo@elte.hu, jbottomley@parallels.com,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] Remove parent field in cpuacct cgroup
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:40:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1316457653.6091.16.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E7770BD.6050902@parallels.com>
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 13:41 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 09/19/2011 01:39 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 13:30 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> >> Since this value is at least intended to
> >> provide a basis for cpu capping in the near future (Well, it is not
> >> there, but I think it is), it is expected to be used much more
> >> frequently by the kernel itself.
> >
> > We just merged a bandwidth limiter quite separate from cpuacct.
>
> Note I was talking about cpuusage. Well, in this case, I myself fail
> to see the value of the whole cpuusage thing... Someone that sees
> further could maybe help us out here? (but this is sideways to the whole
> discussion we're having anyway)
Would probably do to cc the cpuacct authors in this patch set ;-) I
think it came from IBM, so I added vatsa.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-19 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-14 20:04 [PATCH 0/9] Per-cgroup /proc/stat Glauber Costa
2011-09-14 20:04 ` [PATCH 1/9] Remove parent field in cpuacct cgroup Glauber Costa
2011-09-19 16:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 16:09 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-19 16:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 16:30 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-19 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 16:41 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-19 18:40 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-09-20 17:29 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-22 15:11 ` Balbir Singh
2011-09-22 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-23 8:09 ` Balbir Singh
2011-09-23 14:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-23 15:45 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-19 18:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 18:38 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-19 18:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 19:14 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-19 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 19:19 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-14 20:04 ` [PATCH 2/9] Make cpuacct fields per cpu variables Glauber Costa
2011-09-19 16:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 20:04 ` [PATCH 3/9] Include nice values in cpuacct Glauber Costa
2011-09-19 16:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 16:26 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-19 18:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 18:37 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-14 20:04 ` [PATCH 4/9] Include irq and softirq fields " Glauber Costa
2011-09-19 18:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 18:40 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-14 20:04 ` [PATCH 5/9] Include guest " Glauber Costa
2011-09-14 20:04 ` [PATCH 6/9] Include idle and iowait " Glauber Costa
2011-09-20 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 12:36 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-20 12:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 12:58 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-20 13:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 13:29 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-14 20:04 ` [PATCH 7/9] Create cpuacct.proc.stat file Glauber Costa
2011-09-20 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 12:22 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-14 20:04 ` [PATCH 8/9] per-cgroup boot time Glauber Costa
2011-09-20 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 12:37 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-20 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 13:06 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-20 13:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 20:04 ` [PATCH 9/9] Report steal time for cgroup Glauber Costa
2011-09-20 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 20:13 ` [PATCH 0/9] Per-cgroup /proc/stat Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 20:20 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-15 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 20:23 ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-15 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 23:07 ` Paul Turner
2011-09-20 8:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 21:37 ` Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1316457653.6091.16.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.