[PATCH v2 2/2] Add explanation why we do not allow to sparse checkout to empty working tree

["Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>]

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
---
 unpack-trees.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c
index fcf40a0..bacb473 100644
--- a/unpack-trees.c
+++ b/unpack-trees.c
@@ -1119,8 +1119,13 @@ int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_options
 		}
 		if (ret < 0)
 			goto return_failed;
+		/*
+		 * Sparse checkout is meant to narrow down checkout area
+		 * but it does not make sense to narrow down to empty working
+		 * tree. This is usually a mistake in sparse checkout rules.
+		 * Do not allow users to do that.
+		 */
 		if (o->result.cache_nr && empty_worktree) {
-			/* dubious---why should this fail??? */
 			ret = unpack_failed(o, "Sparse checkout leaves no entry on working directory");
 			goto done;
 		}
-- 
1.7.3.1.256.g2539c.dirty