From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934215Ab1JEJqi (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 05:46:38 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:50638 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933732Ab1JEJqh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 05:46:37 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] provide a version of cpuusage statistics inside cpu cgroup From: Peter Zijlstra To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul@paulmenage.org, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, daniel.lezcano@free.fr, jbottomley@parallels.com, Balbir Singh , Paul Turner Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 11:46:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1317583287-18300-10-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> References: <1317583287-18300-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1317583287-18300-10-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3- Message-ID: <1317807988.6766.10.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 23:21 +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > +/* > + * charge this task's execution time to its accounting group. > + * > + * called with rq->lock held. > + */ > +static void cpuusage_charge(struct task_struct *tsk, u64 cputime) > +{ > + int cpu; > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT > + struct cpuacct *ca; > +#endif > +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED > + struct task_group *tg; > +#endif > + cpu = task_cpu(tsk); > + > + rcu_read_lock(); > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT > + ca = task_ca(tsk); > + > + if (unlikely(!cpuacct_subsys.active)) > + goto no_cpuacct; > + > + for (; ca; ca = ca->parent) { > + u64 *cpuusage = per_cpu_ptr(ca->cpuusage, cpu); > + *cpuusage += cputime; > + } > +no_cpuacct: > +#endif > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED > + tg = task_group(tsk); > + for (; tg; tg = tg->parent) { > + u64 *cpuusage = per_cpu_ptr(tg->cpuusage, cpu); > + *cpuusage += cputime; > + } > +#endif > + rcu_read_unlock(); > +} I don't actually think we need to do this. tg->se[cpu]->sum_exec_runtime should contain the same information.