From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ashish Chavan Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: da7210: convert to soc-cache Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:06:58 +0530 Message-ID: <1318419418.12107.187.camel@matrix> References: <1318414416.12107.101.camel@matrix> <20111012104708.GG3647@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from TX2EHSOBE004.bigfish.com (tx2ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.12]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880A2244E8 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:26:26 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20111012104708.GG3647@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, axel.lin@gmail.com, kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com, David Dajun Chen List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 11:47 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 03:43:35PM +0530, Ashish Chavan wrote: > > Hi Axel, > > Don't top post and fix your mail client to thread mails properly; I > didn't actually see your mail until just now due to the lack of > threading. > Ooops! I didn't actually realize that. > > I am thinking of going forward with my posting which is based on current > > version of da7210 mainline driver. In am ready to take the > > responsibility of updating(to base it on my patch series) and testing > > your patch on the hardware that we have. > > > Other option is to wait till your changes gets approved and then base my > > patch series on updated driver with your changes. But as this may take > > some time and I definitely want to get more eyes on the patches early, > > this would be least preferred. > > There's no reason you couldn't do both. Do you mean I can continue posting the patches to get them reviewed and update them as per Axel's patch after review part is over? > > I have to be honest here and say that even if I'd seen your mail before > I applied Axel's patch there's no way I'd have held off on it due to > your unpublished work. Axel's patch is here now, is a clear win and > he's got a strong track record of doing this sort of valuable cleanup > work. In contrast you guys have been working for something like a year > to get the driver for one of your PMICs integrated and haven't yet sent > any patches for audio at all. Without a track record of contributions > it's hard to have confidence that the changes you're proposing will > arrive when you say, or to have any idea about the level of difficulty > in integrating them. > I agree with you here. what you are saying is correct as per your experience. But for da7210 codec, I already have the patch series ready with some confidence.