From: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfstests: fix 122 for recent xfsprogs
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:06:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1318503999.3172.27.camel@doink> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111010182156.GA1323@infradead.org>
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 14:21 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> - filter out xfs_alloctype_t, this was an internal emum that got removed
> - filter out xfs_bmbt_rec_32_t, this is a variant of the xfs_bmbt_rec_t
> that had almost no users and was removed
> - filter out xfs_dinode_core_t, the separate dinode core is gone, and just
> checking the size of the full dinode is enough
> - accept xfs_bmbt_rec_t as the new canonical name for xfs_bmbt_rec_64_t,
> and replace the old name with the new one in the output stream.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-13 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-10 18:21 [PATCH 1/3] xfstests: fix 122 for recent xfsprogs Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-10 18:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfstests: split mapped writes vs direct I/O tests from 091 Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-10 18:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfstests: allow 091 for non-xfs filesystems Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-11 2:11 ` Dave Chinner
2011-10-11 12:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-11 14:18 ` [PATCH 3/3 v2] " Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-11 22:40 ` Dave Chinner
2011-10-13 11:06 ` Alex Elder
2011-10-11 22:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfstests: split mapped writes vs direct I/O tests from 091 Dave Chinner
2011-10-12 7:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-13 11:06 ` Alex Elder
2011-10-13 11:06 ` Alex Elder
2011-10-11 22:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfstests: fix 122 for recent xfsprogs Dave Chinner
2011-10-13 11:06 ` Alex Elder [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1318503999.3172.27.camel@doink \
--to=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.