From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1REg2X-0005cc-GJ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:35:01 +0200 Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p9EBZuar010221 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:35:56 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id WJRTN4h0fq2H for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:35:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (tim [93.97.173.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p9EBZpO9010216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:35:53 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:29:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1318512243.23801.217.camel@ted> <20111013133221.GC28525@jama.jama.net> <1318514192.23801.229.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.1.91- Message-ID: <1318591756.23801.259.camel@ted> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [oe-core 14/20] mesa-dri: introduce MACHINE_DRI_MODULES X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:35:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 11:32 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:56, Richard Purdie > wrote: > ... > >> btw: in old recipes there was --with-dri-drivers with only one -, so maybe it > >> wasn't actually working even for i915, i965 before or configure has benevolent syntax > > > > It defaults to enable all modules. We don't have libdrm-nouveau (or > > llvm) so we had to change the config options to explicitly enable the > > pieces I know are cared about on x86 in the latest version. This is why > > the COMPATIBLE_HOST is there too since that recipe was always meaning to > > compile these modules. > ... > > At least here it hadn't built i915 or i965 drivers. I think there is a slight change in behaviour as the architectures it would have built certain modules on used to get applied, now it doesn't as we're passing a fixed list. We need to fix this but it shouldn't be hard. Cheers, Richard