From: "Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
"tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"avi@redhat.com" <avi@redhat.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"kaber@trash.net" <kaber@trash.net>,
"a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"jeremy@xensource.com" <jeremy@xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Code clean up for percpu_xxx() functions
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:04:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1319090667.23426.159.camel@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319087281.8416.45.camel@edumazet-laptop>
> Sorry this huge patch brings too many potential bugs.
>
> I ask you a separate patch for the networking part, because I dont want
> to Ack all the other parts.
>
Thanks a lot for review! I split the first patch into 2 according your
suggestion. The second one for network here:
>From d5d71127ad22890f6f13fa382736c0df7f5d0231 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:44:37 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] change this_cpu_xxx funcs for preempt safe scenarios
If context is preempt safe, using __this_cpu_xxx to replace this_cpu_xxx
have performance benefit, since the later has a abundant preempt_disable
instruction.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
---
net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c | 12 ++++++------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c b/net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c
index e78103d..678084c 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ tee_tg4(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
const struct xt_tee_tginfo *info = par->targinfo;
struct iphdr *iph;
- if (this_cpu_read(tee_active))
+ if (__this_cpu_read(tee_active))
return XT_CONTINUE;
/*
* Copy the skb, and route the copy. Will later return %XT_CONTINUE for
@@ -127,9 +127,9 @@ tee_tg4(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
ip_send_check(iph);
if (tee_tg_route4(skb, info)) {
- this_cpu_write(tee_active, true);
+ __this_cpu_write(tee_active, true);
ip_local_out(skb);
- this_cpu_write(tee_active, false);
+ __this_cpu_write(tee_active, false);
} else {
kfree_skb(skb);
}
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ tee_tg6(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
{
const struct xt_tee_tginfo *info = par->targinfo;
- if (this_cpu_read(tee_active))
+ if (__this_cpu_read(tee_active))
return XT_CONTINUE;
skb = pskb_copy(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (skb == NULL)
@@ -188,9 +188,9 @@ tee_tg6(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
--iph->hop_limit;
}
if (tee_tg_route6(skb, info)) {
- this_cpu_write(tee_active, true);
+ __this_cpu_write(tee_active, true);
ip6_local_out(skb);
- this_cpu_write(tee_active, false);
+ __this_cpu_write(tee_active, false);
} else {
kfree_skb(skb);
}
--
1.6.3.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-20 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-10 9:10 [PATCH] Code clean up for percpu_xxx() functions Alex,Shi
2011-10-10 17:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-11 9:19 ` Alex,Shi
2011-10-11 14:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-12 1:29 ` Alex,Shi
2011-10-12 13:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-12 14:11 ` Alex,Shi
2011-10-12 14:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-18 3:21 ` Alex,Shi
2011-10-18 14:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-19 9:23 ` Alex,Shi
2011-10-19 9:26 ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-20 2:45 ` Alex,Shi
2011-10-20 7:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] kvm: use this_cpu_xxx replace percpu_xxx funcs Alex,Shi
2011-10-24 2:50 ` Alex,Shi
2011-10-24 11:05 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-21 9:02 ` Alex,Shi
2011-11-21 9:20 ` Avi Kivity
2011-11-21 9:52 ` Alex,Shi
2012-01-11 8:48 ` Alex,Shi
2011-10-19 15:34 ` [PATCH] Code clean up for percpu_xxx() functions Christoph Lameter
2011-10-20 2:44 ` Alex,Shi
2011-10-20 5:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-20 6:04 ` Alex,Shi [this message]
2011-10-20 6:13 ` Alex,Shi
2011-10-20 6:04 ` Alex,Shi
2011-10-20 7:20 ` [PATCH 0/3] code clean and optimzed for percpu_xxx serials funcs Alex,Shi
2011-10-20 7:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: use this_cpu_xxx replace percpu_xxx funcs Alex,Shi
2011-10-20 8:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-21 9:00 ` Alex,Shi
2011-12-02 2:33 ` Alex,Shi
2011-12-02 11:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2012-01-11 8:45 ` Alex,Shi
2012-01-11 9:03 ` David Miller
2012-01-11 9:10 ` Alex,Shi
2011-10-20 7:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] Code clean up for percpu_xxx() functions Alex,Shi
2011-11-21 9:10 ` Alex,Shi
2011-11-22 0:06 ` tj
2012-01-11 9:08 ` Alex,Shi
2012-01-11 17:19 ` tj
2012-01-12 0:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-01-12 2:05 ` Alex,Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1319090667.23426.159.camel@debian \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jeremy@xensource.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.