From: makarand pradhan <makarand_u_pradhan@domain.hid>
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
Cc: "xenomai@xenomai.org" <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] CPU utilization question
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:18:09 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1319552289.52870.YahooMailNeo@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EA67872.30609@domain.hid>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2234 bytes --]
Hi Gilles,
Appreciate your response.
Pl find comments inline.
________________________________
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@domain.hid>
To: makarand pradhan <makarand_u_pradhan@domain.hido.com>
Cc: "xenomai@xenomai.org" <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 4:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] CPU utilization question
On 10/25/2011 12:19 AM, makarand pradhan wrote:
> (...) I'm
> assuming that the ROOT thread captures the %CPU spent in
> Linux/secnodary and each xenomai thread listed, captures the %CPU in
> primary domain. If a thread transitions to the secondary, then I'm
> assuming that the %util in secondary domain will get accounted
> against ROOT and the actual % usage in primary will get accounted
> against the thread.
You are assuming wrong, the CPU utilization measures the activity of the
linux kernel as a whole, including its idle task. So, the sum of all the
primary mode tasks and of the ROOT task is always 100%.
[MP]: Yes. I've noticed that the sum of all tasks is always 100. My question was specifically about a xenomai task that transitions in secondary.
e.g. Assume a xenomai task that uses a total of 20% CPU. Of this assume that 10% is spent executing system calls in secondary domain and 10% is spent in the primary domain. I believe that from an accounting perspective, 10% would get accounted against ROOT and the xenomai task will show a CPU util of 10%. Is this accurate?
> Question:
>
> If the linux process is sleeping, why do I see a CPU util against the
> process? Why is the CPU % util vary based on the activity I do in the
> primary domain?
rt_printf is a primary mode service which causes activity in secondary
mode: the actual printf is done by a plain linux task.
[MP]: Tx. It helped. I've taken the rt_printfs out and now my Linux process that started the xenomai task shows 0% as expected.
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
5136 root 20 0 4936 4372 3688 S 0.0 0.8 0:00.04 a.out
Rgds,
Makarand.
--
Gilles.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5304 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-25 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-24 22:19 [Xenomai-core] CPU utilization question makarand pradhan
2011-10-25 8:50 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-10-25 14:18 ` makarand pradhan [this message]
2011-10-25 15:16 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1319552289.52870.YahooMailNeo@domain.hid \
--to=makarand_u_pradhan@domain.hid \
--cc=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.