All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: rjw@sisk.pl, paul@paulmenage.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, oleg@redhat.com, matthltc@us.ibm.com,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/17] freezer: fix current->state restoration race in refrigerator()
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:05:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320087928-32307-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1320087928-32307-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

refrigerator() saves current->state before entering frozen state and
restores it before returning using __set_current_state(); however,
this is racy, for example, please consider the following sequence.

	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
	try_to_freeze();
	if (kthread_should_stop())
		break;
	schedule();

If kthread_stop() races with ->state restoration, the restoration can
restore ->state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE after kthread_stop() sets it to
TASK_RUNNING but kthread_should_stop() may still see zero
->should_stop because there's no memory barrier between restoring
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and kthread_should_stop() test.

This isn't restricted to kthread_should_stop().  current->state is
often used in memory barrier based synchronization and silently
restoring it w/o mb breaks them.

Use set_current_state() instead.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/freezer.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/freezer.c b/kernel/freezer.c
index 66a594e..19a20b2 100644
--- a/kernel/freezer.c
+++ b/kernel/freezer.c
@@ -58,7 +58,13 @@ void refrigerator(void)
 	current->flags &= ~PF_FREEZING;
 
 	pr_debug("%s left refrigerator\n", current->comm);
-	__set_current_state(save);
+
+	/*
+	 * Restore saved task state before returning.  The mb'd version
+	 * needs to be used; otherwise, it might silently break
+	 * synchronization which depends on ordered task state change.
+	 */
+	set_current_state(save);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(refrigerator);
 
-- 
1.7.3.1


  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-31 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-31 19:05 [PATCHSET pm] freezer: fix various bugs and simplify implementation, take#2 Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 02/17] freezer: don't unnecessarily set PF_NOFREEZE explicitly Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 03/17] freezer: unexport refrigerator() and update try_to_freeze() slightly Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 04/17] freezer: implement and use kthread_freezable_should_stop() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 05/17] freezer: rename thaw_process() to __thaw_task() and simplify the implementation Tejun Heo
2011-11-06 12:04   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-06 16:51     ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-06 17:10       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 06/17] freezer: remove racy clear_freeze_flag() and set PF_NOFREEZE on dead tasks Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 07/17] freezer: don't distinguish nosig tasks on thaw Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 08/17] freezer: use dedicated lock instead of task_lock() + memory barrier Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 09/17] freezer: make freezing indicate freeze condition in effect Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 10/17] freezer: test freezable conditions while holding freezer_lock Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 11/17] freezer: kill PF_FREEZING Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 12/17] freezer: clean up freeze_processes() failure path Tejun Heo
2011-11-03 19:09   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-03 22:25   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 13/17] cgroup_freezer: prepare for removal of TIF_FREEZE Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:33   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 14/17] freezer: make freezing() test freeze conditions in effect instead " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:34   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 15/17] freezer: remove now unused TIF_FREEZE Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 16/17] freezer: remove should_send_signal() and update frozen() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 17/17] freezer: fix set_freezable[_with_signal]() race Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:34 ` [PATCH 18/17] freezer: restructure __refrigerator() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:35 ` [PATCH 19/17] freezer: use lock_task_sighand() in fake_signal_wake_up() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:35 ` [PATCH UPDATED 20/17] freezer: remove unused @sig_only from freeze_task() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:40 ` [PATCHSET UPDATED pm] freezer: fix various bugs and simplify implementation, take#2 Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1320087928-32307-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.