From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750920Ab1KAFIP (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2011 01:08:15 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:42619 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750702Ab1KAFIO (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2011 01:08:14 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX195p4EPFhZ5i6YW5iFJ+c5EimNf6oJ2jWhYhKR4wn dOglUoFcvdhdaa Subject: Re: HT (Hyper Threading) aware process scheduling doesn't work as it should From: Mike Galbraith To: Con Kolivas Cc: "Artem S. Tashkinov" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <2516934.OmMpfqGngS@quad> References: <269467866.49093.1320004632156.JavaMail.mail@webmail17> <1479015.f2tEjKr9vR@quad> <1320061348.6389.18.camel@marge.simson.net> <2516934.OmMpfqGngS@quad> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 06:08:09 +0100 Message-ID: <1320124089.6305.65.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 11:41 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: > Fortunately BFS is about optimising user visible service latency for normal > users running normal applications on normal desktops under normal workloads, > and not about tbench throughput. Unfortunately, cache misses are an equal opportunity pain provider. -Mike