From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [git patches] libata updates, GPG signed (but see admin notes) Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:19:19 +0400 Message-ID: <1320124759.7701.2.camel@dabdike> References: <20111026202235.GA20928@havoc.gtf.org> <1319969101.5215.20.camel@dabdike> <4EAF1731.2070908@zytor.com> <4EAF1FF6.3000500@zytor.com> <4EAF66C7.6080909@zytor.com> <3f01b4a5-8dfa-4eb4-bfa3-490d5ebf0281@email.android.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:36445 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750779Ab1KAFTZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2011 01:19:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3f01b4a5-8dfa-4eb4-bfa3-490d5ebf0281@email.android.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: "hpanvin@gmail.com" Cc: Linus Torvalds , david@lang.hm, Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 21:25 -0700, hpanvin@gmail.com wrote: > Body searches are still slow, at least with dovecot on the server. No > idea about gmail as the server. Actually, my experience is different. I do use body searches a lot (not TSA approved ones, obviously) and I found they're much faster after switching to dovecot (from wu-imapd). However, they also burn massive amounts of CPU time on my server, so it probably helps that I only have a couple of mail users. James