From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932399Ab1KGM5v (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2011 07:57:51 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:33719 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754128Ab1KGM5u convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2011 07:57:50 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Tracepoint: add exec tracepoint From: Peter Zijlstra To: David Smith Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:56:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4EB2BA74.5070207@redhat.com> References: <4EB2BA74.5070207@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3- Message-ID: <1320670609.18053.32.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 10:59 -0500, David Smith wrote: > Added general purpose exec tracepoint. The 'bprm' argument gives > details of the exec. > > This 'changelog' if one can call it that, is completely devoid of rationale, why should we care and why should we merge.