From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] nfsd4: share open and lock owner hash tables
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:59:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320793145-29070-2-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111108225751.GD27413@fieldses.org>
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Now that they're used in the same way, it's a little simpler to put open
and lock owners in the same hash table, and I can't see a reason not to.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index eec9900..dcbe7f3 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -133,21 +133,21 @@ unsigned int max_delegations;
* Open owner state (share locks)
*/
-/* hash tables for open owners */
-#define OPEN_OWNER_HASH_BITS 8
-#define OPEN_OWNER_HASH_SIZE (1 << OPEN_OWNER_HASH_BITS)
-#define OPEN_OWNER_HASH_MASK (OPEN_OWNER_HASH_SIZE - 1)
+/* hash tables for lock and open owners */
+#define OWNER_HASH_BITS 8
+#define OWNER_HASH_SIZE (1 << OWNER_HASH_BITS)
+#define OWNER_HASH_MASK (OWNER_HASH_SIZE - 1)
-static unsigned int open_ownerstr_hashval(u32 clientid, struct xdr_netobj *ownername)
+static unsigned int ownerstr_hashval(u32 clientid, struct xdr_netobj *ownername)
{
unsigned int ret;
ret = opaque_hashval(ownername->data, ownername->len);
ret += clientid;
- return ret & OPEN_OWNER_HASH_MASK;
+ return ret & OWNER_HASH_MASK;
}
-static struct list_head open_ownerstr_hashtbl[OPEN_OWNER_HASH_SIZE];
+static struct list_head ownerstr_hashtbl[OWNER_HASH_SIZE];
/* hash table for nfs4_file */
#define FILE_HASH_BITS 8
@@ -2373,7 +2373,7 @@ static inline void *alloc_stateowner(struct kmem_cache *slab, struct xdr_netobj
static void hash_openowner(struct nfs4_openowner *oo, struct nfs4_client *clp, unsigned int strhashval)
{
- list_add(&oo->oo_owner.so_strhash, &open_ownerstr_hashtbl[strhashval]);
+ list_add(&oo->oo_owner.so_strhash, &ownerstr_hashtbl[strhashval]);
list_add(&oo->oo_perclient, &clp->cl_openowners);
}
@@ -2436,7 +2436,9 @@ find_openstateowner_str(unsigned int hashval, struct nfsd4_open *open)
struct nfs4_stateowner *so;
struct nfs4_openowner *oo;
- list_for_each_entry(so, &open_ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
+ list_for_each_entry(so, &ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
+ if (!so->so_is_open_owner)
+ continue;
if (same_owner_str(so, &open->op_owner, &open->op_clientid)) {
oo = openowner(so);
renew_client(oo->oo_owner.so_client);
@@ -2580,7 +2582,7 @@ nfsd4_process_open1(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
if (open->op_file == NULL)
return nfserr_jukebox;
- strhashval = open_ownerstr_hashval(clientid->cl_id, &open->op_owner);
+ strhashval = ownerstr_hashval(clientid->cl_id, &open->op_owner);
oo = find_openstateowner_str(strhashval, open);
open->op_openowner = oo;
if (!oo) {
@@ -3718,13 +3720,7 @@ out:
}
-/*
- * Lock owner state (byte-range locks)
- */
#define LOFF_OVERFLOW(start, len) ((u64)(len) > ~(u64)(start))
-#define LOCK_HASH_BITS 8
-#define LOCK_HASH_SIZE (1 << LOCK_HASH_BITS)
-#define LOCK_HASH_MASK (LOCK_HASH_SIZE - 1)
static inline u64
end_offset(u64 start, u64 len)
@@ -3746,8 +3742,6 @@ last_byte_offset(u64 start, u64 len)
return end > start ? end - 1: NFS4_MAX_UINT64;
}
-static struct list_head lock_ownerstr_hashtbl[LOCK_HASH_SIZE];
-
/*
* TODO: Linux file offsets are _signed_ 64-bit quantities, which means that
* we can't properly handle lock requests that go beyond the (2^63 - 1)-th
@@ -3815,11 +3809,13 @@ static struct nfs4_lockowner *
find_lockowner_str(struct inode *inode, clientid_t *clid,
struct xdr_netobj *owner)
{
- unsigned int hashval = open_ownerstr_hashval(clid->cl_id, owner);
+ unsigned int hashval = ownerstr_hashval(clid->cl_id, owner);
struct nfs4_lockowner *lo;
struct nfs4_stateowner *op;
- list_for_each_entry(op, &lock_ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
+ list_for_each_entry(op, &ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
+ if (op->so_is_open_owner)
+ continue;
lo = lockowner(op);
if (same_lockowner_ino(lo, inode, clid, owner))
return lo;
@@ -3829,7 +3825,7 @@ find_lockowner_str(struct inode *inode, clientid_t *clid,
static void hash_lockowner(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, unsigned int strhashval, struct nfs4_client *clp, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *open_stp)
{
- list_add(&lo->lo_owner.so_strhash, &lock_ownerstr_hashtbl[strhashval]);
+ list_add(&lo->lo_owner.so_strhash, &ownerstr_hashtbl[strhashval]);
list_add(&lo->lo_perstateid, &open_stp->st_lockowners);
}
@@ -3838,7 +3834,7 @@ static void hash_lockowner(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, unsigned int strhashval, s
* Called in nfsd4_lock - therefore, OPEN and OPEN_CONFIRM (if needed) has
* occurred.
*
- * strhashval = open_ownerstr_hashval
+ * strhashval = ownerstr_hashval
*/
static struct nfs4_lockowner *
@@ -3913,7 +3909,7 @@ __be32 lookup_or_create_lock_state(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, struct n
struct nfs4_ol_stateid, st_perstateowner);
return nfs_ok;
}
- strhashval = open_ownerstr_hashval(cl->cl_clientid.cl_id,
+ strhashval = ownerstr_hashval(cl->cl_clientid.cl_id,
&lock->v.new.owner);
lo = alloc_init_lock_stateowner(strhashval, cl, ost, lock);
if (lo == NULL)
@@ -4277,7 +4273,7 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp;
struct xdr_netobj *owner = &rlockowner->rl_owner;
struct list_head matches;
- unsigned int hashval = open_ownerstr_hashval(clid->cl_id, owner);
+ unsigned int hashval = ownerstr_hashval(clid->cl_id, owner);
__be32 status;
dprintk("nfsd4_release_lockowner clientid: (%08x/%08x):\n",
@@ -4294,7 +4290,9 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
status = nfserr_locks_held;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&matches);
- list_for_each_entry(sop, &lock_ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
+ list_for_each_entry(sop, &ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
+ if (sop->so_is_open_owner)
+ continue;
if (!same_owner_str(sop, owner, clid))
continue;
list_for_each_entry(stp, &sop->so_stateids,
@@ -4444,16 +4442,16 @@ static void release_openowner_sop(struct nfs4_stateowner *sop)
release_openowner(openowner(sop));
}
-static int nfsd_release_n_owners(u64 num,
- struct list_head hashtbl[],
- unsigned int hashtbl_size,
+static int nfsd_release_n_owners(u64 num, bool is_open_owner
void (*release_sop)(struct nfs4_stateowner *))
{
int i, count = 0;
struct nfs4_stateowner *sop, *next;
- for (i = 0; i < hashtbl_size; i++) {
- list_for_each_entry_safe(sop, next, &hashtbl[i], so_strhash) {
+ for (i = 0; i < OWNER_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(sop, next, &ownerstr_hashtbl[i], so_strhash) {
+ if (sop->so_is_open_owner != is_open_owner)
+ continue;
release_sop(sop);
if (++count == num)
return count;
@@ -4467,8 +4465,7 @@ void nfsd_forget_locks(u64 num)
int count;
nfs4_lock_state();
- count = nfsd_release_n_owners(num, lock_ownerstr_hashtbl,
- LOCK_HASH_SIZE, release_lockowner_sop);
+ count = nfsd_release_n_owners(num, false, release_lockowner_sop);
nfs4_unlock_state();
printk(KERN_INFO "NFSD: Forgot %d locks", count);
@@ -4479,8 +4476,7 @@ void nfsd_forget_openowners(u64 num)
int count;
nfs4_lock_state();
- count = nfsd_release_n_owners(num, open_ownerstr_hashtbl,
- OPEN_OWNER_HASH_SIZE, release_openowner_sop);
+ count = nfsd_release_n_owners(num, true, release_openowner_sop);
nfs4_unlock_state();
printk(KERN_INFO "NFSD: Forgot %d open owners", count);
@@ -4549,11 +4545,8 @@ nfs4_state_init(void)
for (i = 0; i < FILE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&file_hashtbl[i]);
}
- for (i = 0; i < OPEN_OWNER_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&open_ownerstr_hashtbl[i]);
- }
- for (i = 0; i < LOCK_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lock_ownerstr_hashtbl[i]);
+ for (i = 0; i < OWNER_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ownerstr_hashtbl[i]);
}
memset(&onestateid, ~0, sizeof(stateid_t));
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&close_lru);
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-08 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-14 11:44 [PATCH 00/25] nfsd4 state cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:44 ` [PATCH 01/25] nfsd4: centralize handling of replay owners J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:44 ` [PATCH 02/25] nfsd4: cleanup seqid op stateowner usage J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:44 ` [PATCH 03/25] nfsd4: extend state lock over seqid replay logic J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-27 16:55 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-09-28 1:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-28 1:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-28 13:18 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-09-28 13:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 04/25] nfsd4: eliminate impossible open replay case J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 05/25] nfsd4: drop most stateowner refcounting J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 06/25] nfsd4: eliminate unused lt_stateowner J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 07/25] nfsd4: share common seqid checks J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 08/25] nfsd4: simplify check_open logic J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 09/25] nfsd4: move double-confirm test to open_confirm J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 10/25] nfsd4: move CLOSE_STATE special case to caller J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 11/25] nfsd4: split stateowners into open and lockowners J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 12/25] nfsd4: split out some free_generic_stateid code J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 13/25] nfsd4: rearrange to avoid a forward reference J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 14/25] nfsd4: split up find_stateid J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 15/25] nfsd4: split preprocess_seqid, cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 16/25] nfsd4: pass around typemask instead of flags J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 17/25] nfsd4: rename init_stateid J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 18/25] nfsd4: remove redundant stateid initialization J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 19/25] nfsd4: move some of nfs4_stateid into a separate structure J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 20/25] nfsd4: add common dl_stid field to delegation J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 21/25] nfsd4: share common stid-hashing helper function J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 22/25] nfsd4: hash deleg stateid's like any other J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 23/25] nfsd4: fix test_stateid for delegation stateid's J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 24/25] nfsd4: use deleg changes to cleanup preprocess_stateid_op J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-14 11:45 ` [PATCH 25/25] nfsd4: better stateid hashing J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-19 13:14 ` [PATCH 00/25] nfsd4 state cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-19 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] nfsd4: replace oo_confirmed by flag bit J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-19 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] nfsd4: match close replays on stateid, not open owner id J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-19 13:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] nfsd4: simplify free_stateid J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-19 13:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] nfsd4: construct stateid from clientid and counter J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-27 16:10 ` Bryan Schumaker
2011-09-28 15:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-03 14:43 ` Benny Halevy
2011-10-03 14:57 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-03 15:13 ` Benny Halevy
2011-10-03 15:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-04 15:52 ` Benny Halevy
2011-10-04 16:02 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-19 13:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] nfsd4: hash closed stateid's like any other J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-26 22:36 ` [PATCH 00/25] nfsd4 state cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-26 22:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-26 22:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-26 22:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] nfsd4: move client * to nfs4_stateid, add init_stid helper J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-26 22:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] nfsd4: use idr for stateid's J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-26 22:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] nfsd4: assume test_stateid always has session J. Bruce Fields
2011-09-26 22:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] nfsd4: look up stateid's per clientid J. Bruce Fields
2011-11-08 22:57 ` [PATCH 00/25] nfsd4 state cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2011-11-08 22:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] nfsd4: hash lockowners to simplify RELEASE_LOCKOWNER J. Bruce Fields
2011-11-08 22:59 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2011-11-08 22:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] nfsd4: add a separate (lockowner, inode) lookup J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1320793145-29070-2-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com \
--to=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.