From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 277C1B6F95 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:15:16 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <1322439281.23348.34.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/13] powerpc: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER and provide seccomp_execve From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Will Drewry Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:14:41 +1100 In-Reply-To: <1314682083.2488.73.camel@pasglop> References: <1308875813-20122-1-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org> <1308875813-20122-11-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org> <1314682083.2488.73.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com, scarybeasts@gmail.com, djm@mindrot.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, jmorris@namei.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, kees.cook@canonical.com, Paul Mackerras , mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, segoon@openwall.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 15:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 19:36 -0500, Will Drewry wrote: > > Facilitate the use of CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER by wrapping compatibility > > system call numbering for execve and selecting HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER. > > > > v9: rebase on to bccaeafd7c117acee36e90d37c7e05c19be9e7bf > > > > Signed-off-by: Will Drewry > > Seen these around for a while ... :-) > > I don't see a harm in the patches per-se tho I haven't reviewed the > actual seccomp filter stuff and it's good (or bad) behaviour on ppc. Did that stuff every got anywhere ? I don't see HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER upsteam ... should I just drop the powerpc patch from patchwork ? Cheers, Ben. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754752Ab1K1APo (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Nov 2011 19:15:44 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:43694 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752368Ab1K1APn (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Nov 2011 19:15:43 -0500 Message-ID: <1322439281.23348.34.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/13] powerpc: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER and provide seccomp_execve From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Will Drewry Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, scarybeasts@gmail.com, djm@mindrot.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, segoon@openwall.com, tglx@linutronix.de, Paul Mackerras , kees.cook@canonical.com, jmorris@namei.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:14:41 +1100 In-Reply-To: <1314682083.2488.73.camel@pasglop> References: <1308875813-20122-1-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org> <1308875813-20122-11-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org> <1314682083.2488.73.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 15:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 19:36 -0500, Will Drewry wrote: > > Facilitate the use of CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER by wrapping compatibility > > system call numbering for execve and selecting HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER. > > > > v9: rebase on to bccaeafd7c117acee36e90d37c7e05c19be9e7bf > > > > Signed-off-by: Will Drewry > > Seen these around for a while ... :-) > > I don't see a harm in the patches per-se tho I haven't reviewed the > actual seccomp filter stuff and it's good (or bad) behaviour on ppc. Did that stuff every got anywhere ? I don't see HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER upsteam ... should I just drop the powerpc patch from patchwork ? Cheers, Ben.