From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754900Ab1LAPFo (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:05:44 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:54767 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754766Ab1LAPFn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:05:43 -0500 Message-ID: <1322751913.4699.19.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH] jump_label: jump_label for boot options. From: Peter Zijlstra To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , rostedt@goodmis.org, Johannes Weiner Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:05:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20111201115353.563f79fc.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20111201115353.563f79fc.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 11:53 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > I tried to use jump_label for handling memcg's boot options which sets > global variable true/false and never changes after boot. And found jump_table > is larger than expected. This patch is a trial to allow to place jump_table > in .init section. How do you think ? I think its much saner to go help hnaz remove this shadow page table and thus the need for this stupid boot time param.