From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tim.rpsys.net (93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.173.237]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0334DE00303 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 16:10:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBA0Ac46008247; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:10:38 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07588-09; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:10:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBA0ATeg008241 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:10:29 GMT Message-ID: <1323475840.5309.201.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Philip Balister Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:10:40 +0000 In-Reply-To: <4EE2392A.1040302@balister.org> References: <1323431474.5309.128.camel@ted> <1323447637.5309.180.camel@ted> <4EE2392A.1040302@balister.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: McClintock Matthew-B29882 , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: meta-oe branch for edison? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:10:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 11:36 -0500, Philip Balister wrote: > On 12/09/2011 11:20 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 15:46 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Richard Purdie > >> wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:01 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> Can we create a meta-oe repo in git.yoctoproject.org? > >>> > >>> This might create a little friction with the OE community. What would be > >>> the reason for the repository? > >>> > >>>> I'd like to also > >>>> create a branh within the repo that tracks a valid version of the repo > >>>> for specific Yocto releases. > >>>> > >>>> (I can add that in my investigation so far - > >>>> f78f3f31c06c669006fcb567c8f503d4dbec68da looks like a good starting > >>>> commit for edison) > >>> > >>> I'd certainly be happy to see such a branch. It might be more > >>> appropriate to call it 2011-1 which corresponds to the OE-Core branch > >>> name that is edison in the poky repo. > >> > >> Well I don't particularly care if we create a repo or not. I just want > >> a place to go for a working meta-oe for all future releases of Yocto. > >> I had to figure this out on my own, but I'm can imagine others will > >> attempt similar things. > > > > I think it should be fine to add an appropriate branch to the meta-oe > > repository itself. > > We should probably have this discussion on the oe list. > > Basically, we should have a way to create a "stable" branch for oe-core > and meta-oe. There also needs to be some "policy" in place for commits. > The primary concern is making sure the development branches get all > needed fixes that go into the branches. There is a 2011-1 branch in oe-core and there is going to be an update policy of bugfixes but not upgrades or new features for that. Cheers, Richard