From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ausc60pc101.us.dell.com (ausc60pc101.us.dell.com [143.166.85.206]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491B3E0030F for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:27:12 -0800 (PST) X-Loopcount0: from 10.9.160.253 From: Michael E Brown To: Paul Eggleton Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:27:28 -0600 In-Reply-To: <3295079.2DL3Md5Ydr@helios> References: <1408073.zz37vY4uZy@helios> <3295079.2DL3Md5Ydr@helios> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3 (3.0.3-1.fc15) Message-ID: <1323714448.27202.0.camel@duo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: McClintock Matthew-B29882 , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Sanity tested distributions list X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:27:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 11:16 -0600, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Tuesday 06 December 2011 15:59:39 McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Paul Eggleton > > wrote: > > > We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel > > > we > > > reached a proper conclusion on the list of tested distributions we want > > > to set (SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS) and I assume we want to support a few > > > more distros (latest versions of Fedora & Ubuntu, presumably?). I'd > > > like to update and re- post the patch [3] so we can close bug #1096 [4] > > > but for that we need to agree on the list. > > > > I'm fairly comprehensively testing something close to the edison 1.1.1 > > release on CentOS 5.5 and Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. We plan on adding more but > > maybe not in time for our next release. > > I can definitely see a compelling reason to mark CentOS 5.x as supported, but > the problem with it is it doesn't come with Python 2.6, so BitBake won't work > out of the box (actually right now it fails before it has a chance to show a > reasonable error message, which is even worse). We really need a concise set > of instructions on how to install the external python tarball, at the moment I > don't think we have these. EPEL has a python26 RPM which works perfectly well if you add a ~/bin/python symlink to python26. No need to compile python from scratch. -- Michael