[PATCH 5/7] Use strtoull instead of strtoul where applicable

[Dan McGee <dan-fd97jBR+K/6hPH1hqNUYSQ@public.gmane.org>]

When parsing into u64 or unsigned long long storage, we should use the
correct library function.

Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan-fd97jBR+K/6hPH1hqNUYSQ@public.gmane.org>
---
 bin/dumpseg.c                  |    4 ++--
 sbin/nilfs-clean/nilfs-clean.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bin/dumpseg.c b/bin/dumpseg.c
index fbc587d..d6b4290 100644
--- a/bin/dumpseg.c
+++ b/bin/dumpseg.c
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 		fprintf(stderr, "%s: too few arguments\n", progname);
 		exit(1);
 	} else {
-		strtoul(argv[optind], &endptr, DUMPSEG_BASE);
+		strtoull(argv[optind], &endptr, DUMPSEG_BASE);
 		if (*endptr == '\0')
 			dev = NULL;
 		else
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
 	status = 0;
 	for (i = optind; i < argc; i++) {
-		segnum = strtoul(argv[i], &endptr, DUMPSEG_BASE);
+		segnum = strtoull(argv[i], &endptr, DUMPSEG_BASE);
 		if (*endptr != '\0') {
 			fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s: invalid segment number\n",
 				progname, argv[i]);
diff --git a/sbin/nilfs-clean/nilfs-clean.c b/sbin/nilfs-clean/nilfs-clean.c
index 9d92b67..25aa14a 100644
--- a/sbin/nilfs-clean/nilfs-clean.c
+++ b/sbin/nilfs-clean/nilfs-clean.c
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static int nilfs_clean_parse_protection_period(const char *arg)
 	char *endptr;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	period = strtoul(arg, &endptr, 10);
+	period = strtoull(arg, &endptr, 10);
 	if (endptr == arg) {
 		myprintf(_("Error: invalid protection period: %s\n"), arg);
 		ret = -1;
-- 
1.7.8

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html