From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, avi@redhat.com, nate@cpanel.net,
cl@linux-foundation.org, oleg@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
vgoyal@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] mempool: fix first round failure behavior
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:45:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1324590326-10135-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1324590326-10135-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
mempool modifies gfp_mask so that the backing allocator doesn't try
too hard or trigger warning message when there's pool to fall back on.
In addition, for the first try, it removes __GFP_WAIT and IO, so that
it doesn't trigger reclaim or wait when allocation can be fulfilled
from pool; however, when that allocation fails and pool is empty too,
it waits for the pool to be replenished before retrying.
Allocation which could have succeeded after a bit of reclaim has to
wait on the reserved items and it's not like mempool doesn't retry
with __GFP_WAIT and IO. It just does that *after* someone returns an
element, pointlessly delaying things.
Fix it by retrying immediately if the first round of allocation
attempts w/o __GFP_WAIT and IO fails.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/mempool.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempool.c b/mm/mempool.c
index e3a802a..6326cc6 100644
--- a/mm/mempool.c
+++ b/mm/mempool.c
@@ -221,14 +221,23 @@ repeat_alloc:
return element;
}
- /* We must not sleep in the GFP_ATOMIC case */
+ /*
+ * We use gfp mask w/o __GFP_WAIT or IO for the first round. If
+ * alloc failed with that and @pool was empty, retry immediately.
+ */
+ if (gfp_temp != gfp_mask) {
+ gfp_temp = gfp_mask;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->lock, flags);
+ goto repeat_alloc;
+ }
+
+ /* We must not sleep if !__GFP_WAIT */
if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT)) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->lock, flags);
return NULL;
}
/* Let's wait for someone else to return an element to @pool */
- gfp_temp = gfp_mask;
init_wait(&wait);
prepare_to_wait(&pool->wait, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
--
1.7.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-22 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-22 21:45 [PATCHSET] block, mempool, percpu: implement percpu mempool and fix blkcg percpu alloc deadlock Tejun Heo
2011-12-22 21:45 ` [PATCH 1/7] mempool: fix and document synchronization and memory barrier usage Tejun Heo
2011-12-22 21:45 ` [PATCH 2/7] mempool: drop unnecessary and incorrect BUG_ON() from mempool_destroy() Tejun Heo
2011-12-22 21:45 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-12-22 21:45 ` [PATCH 4/7] mempool: factor out mempool_fill() Tejun Heo
2011-12-22 21:45 ` [PATCH 5/7] mempool: separate out __mempool_create() Tejun Heo
2011-12-22 21:45 ` [PATCH 6/7] mempool, percpu: implement percpu mempool Tejun Heo
2011-12-22 21:45 ` [PATCH 7/7] block: fix deadlock through percpu allocation in blk-cgroup Tejun Heo
2011-12-23 1:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-12-23 22:54 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-22 21:59 ` [PATCHSET] block, mempool, percpu: implement percpu mempool and fix blkcg percpu alloc deadlock Andrew Morton
2011-12-22 22:09 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-22 22:20 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22 22:41 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-22 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22 23:00 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-22 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22 23:24 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-22 23:41 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-22 23:54 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-23 1:14 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-23 15:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-12-27 18:34 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-27 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-27 21:44 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-27 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-27 22:22 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-23 1:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-12-23 1:38 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-23 2:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-12-23 3:11 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-23 14:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-12-27 21:25 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-27 22:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-27 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-27 22:30 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-16 15:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-12-23 1:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-12-23 1:58 ` Andrew Morton
2011-12-23 2:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-12-26 6:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-27 17:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-28 0:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-28 0:41 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-05 1:28 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-16 15:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-09 23:58 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-10 16:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-13 22:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-02-15 15:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-12-23 14:46 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1324590326-10135-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nate@cpanel.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.