From: Krzysztof Adamski <k@adamski.org>
To: Mattias Wadenstein <maswan@acc.umu.se>
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>,
Jeremy Thompson <jeremythompson82@gmail.com>,
Brad Campbell <brad@fnarfbargle.com>, Asdo <asdo@shiftmail.org>,
linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: It is safe to stop Raid being reshaped
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:51:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1325256685.7358.34.camel@oxygen.netxsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1112301310190.24961@montezuma.acc.umu.se>
On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 13:16 +0100, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2011, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, Jeremy Thompson wrote:
> >
> >> I thought about this as well - I have an Enermax 450 in there right now...
> >> I'll have to look for a higher watt power supply next I guess.
> >
> > Also look at how your feeds are balanced. Some PSUs have two rails, putting
> > all drives on a single rail causes your load handling capacity to go down
> > significantly. I recommend getting a single rail PSU as well, well above the
> > capacity you think you need.
>
> Not only that, take a good look at both the 5V and 12V specs, and compare
> them to the draw needed by the drives (and the rest of the system). I've
> found that the ammount of 5V available varies lots between PSUs, without
> much correlation with the 12V supply. Which is fine for modern CPUs/GPUs
> which mostly uses 12V, but drives seem to want quite a bit of 5V too.
>
> One other common problem with multiple rail PSUs is that often all the
> useful power connectors (sata/molex) are only on one rail. I wouldn't mind
> multiple rails if I could actually use all of them for drives.
>
> For the 24-drive home build I've done, I've actually ended up running two
> PSUs in parallel (joining ground), but this is hardly something to
> recommend to anyone sane. ;)
I can give you my recommendation for a power supply based on my box.
The box has 22 drives (all 7200), dual core Phenom II, 8 Gig ram.
The PS is a OCZ ModXstream Pro 700. It has been running for over a year
without showing any problems. In a normal steady state the box draws 260
Watts from the wall as measures by a Kill-A-Watt device.
K
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-30 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-28 17:55 It is safe to stop Raid being reshaped Jeremy Thompson
2011-12-28 18:15 ` Gordon Henderson
2011-12-28 19:02 ` Asdo
2011-12-28 19:06 ` Jeremy Thompson
2011-12-29 2:02 ` Asdo
2011-12-29 2:23 ` Jeremy Thompson
2011-12-29 11:21 ` Gordon Henderson
2011-12-29 23:35 ` Brad Campbell
2011-12-29 23:37 ` Jeremy Thompson
2011-12-30 4:31 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2011-12-30 4:31 ` Jeremy Thompson
2011-12-30 6:19 ` Brad Campbell
2011-12-30 12:16 ` Mattias Wadenstein
2011-12-30 14:51 ` Krzysztof Adamski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1325256685.7358.34.camel@oxygen.netxsys.com \
--to=k@adamski.org \
--cc=asdo@shiftmail.org \
--cc=brad@fnarfbargle.com \
--cc=jeremythompson82@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maswan@acc.umu.se \
--cc=swmike@swm.pp.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.