All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/6] locks: break delegations on rename
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:00:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1326816029-13913-5-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326816029-13913-1-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com>

From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>

To rely on the i_mutex for exclusion between setlease and rename, we
need rename to take the i_mutex on the source as well as on any possible
target.

Also fix up lockdep and the Documentation/filesystems/directory-locking
documentation.  (I need to review the latter one more time to make sure
I've got it right.)

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/directory-locking |   11 ++++++-----
 fs/namei.c                                  |   17 +++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/fs.h                          |    9 ++++++---
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/directory-locking b/Documentation/filesystems/directory-locking
index ff7b611..c51cbed 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/directory-locking
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/directory-locking
@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ kinds of locks - per-inode (->i_mutex) and per-filesystem
 locks victim and calls the method.
 
 4) rename() that is _not_ cross-directory.  Locking rules: caller locks
-the parent, finds source and target, if target already exists - locks it
-and then calls the method.
+the parent, finds source and target, locks source, also locks target if
+it already exists, and then calls the method.
 
 5) link creation.  Locking rules:
 	* lock parent
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ rules:
 		fail with -ENOTEMPTY
 	* if new parent is equal to or is a descendent of source
 		fail with -ELOOP
+	* lock source if it is not a directory.
 	* if target exists - lock it.
 	* call the method.
 
@@ -56,9 +57,9 @@ objects - A < B iff A is an ancestor of B.
     renames will be blocked on filesystem lock and we don't start changing
     the order until we had acquired all locks).
 
-(3) any operation holds at most one lock on non-directory object and
-    that lock is acquired after all other locks.  (Proof: see descriptions
-    of operations).
+(3) locks on non-directory objects are acquired only after taking locks
+    on their parents (which remain their parents by (1) and (2)).
+    (Proof: see descriptions of operations).
 
 	Now consider the minimal deadlock.  Each process is blocked on
 attempt to acquire some lock and already holds at least one lock.  Let's
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 7182209..facf295 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -3075,6 +3075,7 @@ static int vfs_rename_other(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
 			    struct inode *new_dir, struct dentry *new_dentry)
 {
 	struct inode *target = new_dentry->d_inode;
+	struct inode *source = old_dentry->d_inode;
 	int error;
 
 	error = security_inode_rename(old_dir, old_dentry, new_dir, new_dentry);
@@ -3082,13 +3083,23 @@ static int vfs_rename_other(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
 		return error;
 
 	dget(new_dentry);
-	if (target)
+	mutex_lock_nested(&source->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_RENAME_SOURCE);
+	error = break_lease(source, BREAK_ONLY_DELEGS|BREAK_ALL_LEASES);
+	if (error)
+		goto out_unlock_source;
+	if (target) {
 		mutex_lock(&target->i_mutex);
-
+		error = break_lease(target, BREAK_ONLY_DELEGS|BREAK_ALL_LEASES);
+		if (error)
+			goto out;
+	}
 	error = -EBUSY;
 	if (d_mountpoint(old_dentry)||d_mountpoint(new_dentry))
 		goto out;
 
+	error = break_lease(old_dentry->d_inode, BREAK_ONLY_DELEGS|BREAK_ALL_LEASES);
+	if (error)
+		goto out;
 	error = old_dir->i_op->rename(old_dir, old_dentry, new_dir, new_dentry);
 	if (error)
 		goto out;
@@ -3100,6 +3111,8 @@ static int vfs_rename_other(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
 out:
 	if (target)
 		mutex_unlock(&target->i_mutex);
+out_unlock_source:
+	mutex_unlock(&source->i_mutex);
 	dput(new_dentry);
 	return error;
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 939cb3b..dccec8c 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -848,10 +848,12 @@ static inline int inode_unhashed(struct inode *inode)
  * 0: the object of the current VFS operation
  * 1: parent
  * 2: child/target
- * 3: quota file
+ * 3: xattr
+ * 4: quota file
+ * 5: the file being renamed (used only in rename of a non-directory)
  *
  * The locking order between these classes is
- * parent -> child -> normal -> xattr -> quota
+ * parent -> child -> rename_source -> normal -> xattr -> quota
  */
 enum inode_i_mutex_lock_class
 {
@@ -859,7 +861,8 @@ enum inode_i_mutex_lock_class
 	I_MUTEX_PARENT,
 	I_MUTEX_CHILD,
 	I_MUTEX_XATTR,
-	I_MUTEX_QUOTA
+	I_MUTEX_QUOTA,
+	I_MUTEX_RENAME_SOURCE
 };
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.5.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-17 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-17 16:00 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Fix NFSv4 delegations J. Bruce Fields
2012-01-17 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] locks: introduce new FL_DELEG lock flag J. Bruce Fields
2012-01-17 16:00   ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-01-17 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] locks: give break_lease its own flags J. Bruce Fields
2012-01-17 16:17   ` Bypass encrypt and decrypt data in dm-crypt Fan Zhang
2012-01-17 16:17     ` Fan Zhang
2012-01-17 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] locks: break delegations on unlink J. Bruce Fields
2012-01-17 16:00   ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-01-17 16:00 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-01-17 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] locks: break delegations on any attribute modification J. Bruce Fields
2012-01-17 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] locks: break delegations on link J. Bruce Fields
2012-01-17 16:00   ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-03 20:58 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Fix NFSv4 delegations J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-03 21:09   ` Provide vfs support for " J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-03 21:09     ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-03 21:09   ` [PATCH 1/6] locks: introduce new FL_DELEG lock flag J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-03 21:09   ` [PATCH 2/6] locks: give break_lease its own flags J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-03 21:09     ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-03 21:09   ` [PATCH 3/6] locks: break delegations on unlink J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-03 21:09     ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-03 21:09   ` [PATCH 4/6] locks: break delegations on rename J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-03 21:09   ` [PATCH 5/6] locks: break delegations on any attribute modification J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-03 21:09   ` [PATCH 6/6] locks: break delegations on link J. Bruce Fields
2012-02-03 21:09     ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1326816029-13913-5-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com \
    --to=bfields@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.