From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH] introduce res_counter_charge_nofail() for socket allocations Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:57:09 -0500 Message-ID: <1327006629.3025.17.camel@dabdike> References: <1326899758-9013-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20120119143607.GF13932@tiehlicka.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120119143607.GF13932-VqjxzfR4DlwKmadIfiO5sKVXKuFTiq87@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Michal Hocko Cc: Glauber Costa , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Johannes Weiner , Tejun Heo , Li Zefan On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 15:36 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > I guess you should have CCed cgroups maintainers as well. > Let's do that now So this is just my preference in SCSI and cgroup maintainers get to specify their own preferences, but as a maintainer, I subscribe to the mailing lists, so there's no need to cc me directly. In fact, I prefer that you don't cc me directly since it would just clutter up my inbox and wouldn't be really helpful because all my scripts operate on my linux-scsi folder (however, I also have a procmail rule that trashes an email directly to me that also went to linux-scsi, so cc'ing me directly is usually harmless). James