From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: Still TODO for 4.2? xl domain numa memory allocation vs xm/xend
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:04:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1327061083.2337.42.camel@Abyss> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327060480.30054.15.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1214 bytes --]
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 11:54 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> This might be doable for HVM guests but for PV guests pretty much the
> only way would be a kind of local migration which would need tool
> support. For the PV case hybrid support would help (by introducing HAP
> for PV guests). Not saying it's not worthwhile but might just be harder
> than it sounds.
>
That local migration analogy was exactly what came out when we were
trying to envision how to deal with the PV guest case. I still know too
few about all this to have a authoritative opinion, so, for now, thanks
for the warning! :-D
> > Of course, even in such mode, if the user explicitly tells us what he
> > wants, e.g., by means of cpupools, pinning, etc., we should still honour
> > such request.
>
> Do we get this right now?
>
Sorry, not sure what you mean here...
Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
PhD Candidate, ReTiS Lab, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa (Italy)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-20 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-04 16:29 RFC: Still TODO for 4.2? Ian Campbell
2012-01-04 16:47 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-01-04 16:51 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-01-16 13:42 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-04 16:55 ` Jan Beulich
2012-01-16 13:39 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-16 14:48 ` Jan Beulich
2012-01-16 15:00 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-01-04 17:25 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-01-04 17:36 ` George Dunlap
2012-01-04 18:20 ` Tim Deegan
2012-01-05 10:39 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-06 15:24 ` RFC: Still TODO for 4.2? Nested Paging for Intel Nested Virt Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-01-04 19:21 ` RFC: Still TODO for 4.2? Wei Huang
2012-01-04 19:43 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-01-04 19:57 ` Wei Huang
2012-01-05 7:27 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-01-06 15:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-01-06 19:08 ` Wei Huang
2012-02-06 17:57 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-02-13 17:52 ` Extracting ATI/AMD Radeon VBIOS ROM Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-01-05 13:19 ` Re : RFC: Still TODO for 4.2? David TECHER
2012-01-05 13:25 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-05 13:41 ` Re : " David TECHER
2012-01-05 16:18 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-16 13:28 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-16 14:39 ` Re : " David TECHER
2012-01-04 17:39 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-01-05 18:07 ` Driver domains and hotplug scripts, redux Ian Jackson
2012-01-06 12:01 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-01-09 10:08 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-01-09 12:26 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-01-09 17:39 ` Ian Jackson
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201101448030.3150@kaball-desktop>
[not found] ` <20236.23822.715733.455559@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201101547540.3150@kaball-desktop>
[not found] ` <20236.24780.865152.458124@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201101619460.3150@kaball-desktop>
[not found] ` <20236.27158.706017.813195@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201101655390.3150@kaball-desktop>
[not found] ` <20236.28931.127139.752426@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
2012-01-11 11:50 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-01-11 12:17 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-11 14:26 ` Dave Scott
2012-01-12 16:50 ` Ian Jackson
2012-01-12 18:07 ` Dave Scott
2012-01-11 14:44 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-01-12 16:48 ` Ian Jackson
2012-01-16 17:52 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-01-16 17:58 ` Ian Jackson
2012-01-17 9:17 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-17 9:30 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-01-17 9:43 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-17 9:40 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-01-17 9:52 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-17 10:00 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-01-17 10:39 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-23 11:40 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-01-27 8:43 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-01-27 10:57 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-01-31 9:57 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-01-31 10:06 ` Tim Deegan
2012-01-31 13:47 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-01-31 13:51 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-31 13:51 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-01-31 20:02 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-17 9:22 ` Roger Pau Monné
2012-01-11 12:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-01-05 17:49 ` RFC: Still TODO for 4.2? Ian Jackson
2012-01-06 13:37 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-10 16:06 ` Ian Jackson
2012-01-16 11:55 ` George Dunlap
2012-01-19 21:14 ` RFC: Still TODO for 4.2? xl domain numa memory allocation vs xm/xend Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-01-20 7:59 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 8:15 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-01-20 9:01 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 9:47 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-01-20 11:56 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-23 9:59 ` Juergen Gross
2012-01-20 10:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-01-20 11:22 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 11:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-01-20 11:44 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-01-20 11:54 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 12:04 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2012-01-20 12:33 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 13:11 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 15:06 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 16:02 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-01-20 16:21 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 16:28 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 16:31 ` George Dunlap
2012-01-20 16:39 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 16:43 ` George Dunlap
2012-01-20 16:54 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 17:32 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-01-23 10:19 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-23 13:14 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-01-23 13:20 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 16:55 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 16:59 ` George Dunlap
2012-01-20 16:58 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-01-20 17:23 ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 17:28 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-01-20 11:26 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1327061083.2337.42.camel@Abyss \
--to=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.