From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq7De-0004g3-Jp for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:05:14 +0100 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq76A-0001eC-1s for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:57:30 +0100 From: Phil Blundell To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:57:29 +0000 In-Reply-To: <3543079.3rgjSx9VfG@helios> References: <1592899.mTy93uB97i@helios> <1908796.glHMrEiIxU@helios> <4F202735.8040405@balister.org> <3543079.3rgjSx9VfG@helios> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1327514250.29933.37.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Splitting meta-oe X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:05:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 17:41 +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 11:00:53 Philip Balister wrote: > > We should try and have a face to face meeting with OE developers at ELC > > in a few weeks to talk about some of these issues. > > Unfortunately I won't be at ELC in person. Time difference and technology > allowing I could be there virtually or have someone who is there represent me, > but I do think that we should be able to resolve most things here on the > mailing lists (if not fully then at least as preparation for an in-person > discussion). Agreed. I think the mailing lists ought to remain the primary forum for decision-making. If there's something that needs to be discussed, let's do it here. If we can't reach a consensus, that's what we have the TSC for. p.