From: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>, Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: virtio-9p-test.c:300:v9fs_req_recv: assertion failed (hdr.id == id): (7 == 73)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:45:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13275468.fAp1jBoSgB@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7836238.thhSn8XZEd@silver>
On Montag, 23. November 2020 14:48:15 CET Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Montag, 23. November 2020 14:17:34 CET Greg Kurz wrote:
> > Fixed maintainer's address: s/oss@crudebyte.com/qemu_oss@crudebyte.com
> >
> > On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 17:03:14 -0500
> >
> > Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Hi, I'm consistently seeing this assertion running the qemu-5.2.0 test
> > > suite. rc0, rc1, rc2 have been consistently affected, it reproduces
> > > consistently in parts of Fedora's build system. Here's an example build
> > > log for rc2 x86 against Fedora 32
> > >
> > > https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@kubevirt/qemu-5.2.0-> > > 0.
> > > 6.rc2/fedora-32-x86_64/01781514-qemu/builder-live.log.gz
> > >
> > > The full test error:
> > >
> > > ...
> > > PASS 26 qtest-arm/qos-test
> > > /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/virtio-9p-device/virtio-9p/virtio-9p-te
> > > st
> > > s/synth/readdir/split_128 PASS 27 qtest-arm/qos-test
> > > /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/virtio-9p-device/virtio-9p/virtio-9p-te
> > > st
> > > s/local/config
> >
> > Ok so the next test is supposed to be:
> >
> > /arm/virt/virtio-mmio/virtio-bus/virtio-9p-device/virtio-9p/virtio-9p-test
> > s/ local/create_dir
> >
> > This was added recently. This configures the virtio-9p device in QEMU
> > to serve a real test directory from the host. This test directory is
> > created under the current directory of the test process. The purpose
> > of the test is then to ask the 9p server to create a directory within
> > the test directory.
> >
> > > Received response 7 (RLERROR) instead of 73 (RMKDIR)
> > > ERROR qtest-arm/qos-test - Bail out!
> > > ERROR:../tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c:300:v9fs_req_recv: assertion
> > > failed (hdr.id == id): (7 == 73)
> > > Rlerror has errno 95 (Operation not supported)
> >
> > So this basically means that QEMU got ENOTSUP/EOPNOTSUPP when calling
> > mkdir() into the test directory... not sure what could cause that. I'd
> > need more details on the filesystem setup for the build.
> >
> > Anyway, we already experienced some breakage in upstream CI because of
> > the same family of tests that do real access to the host filesystem.
> > Since they're being introduced in QEMU 5.2, I'll try to see if I can
> > disable them to be run by default for RC3.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --
> > Greg
> >
> > > **
> > > ERROR:../tests/qtest/virtio-9p-test.c:300:v9fs_req_recv: assertion
> > > failed (hdr.id == id): (7 == 73)
> > > make: *** [Makefile.mtest:1257: run-test-155] Error 1
> > > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.EG4Dav (%check)
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Cole
>
> Yeah, looks like the mkdir() call which is supposed to create the 9p test
> directory, is failing there for some reason. The question is how to find
> that out (effectively) without having access to an affected system.
>
> It's now too late for 5.2, but I think for 6.0 it would make sense
> introducing a dedicated 9p option loglevel=..., so we can tell people to
> enable this to capture the precise source location where an error ocurred.
> That would mean spreading a huge bunch of macros all over the 9p code base,
> but it would definitely help a lot understanding the root cause of reported
> issues in an efficient way.
>
> Best regards,
> Christian Schoenebeck
Cole, does the affected host system probably not have xattrs enabled on its
file system?
Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-23 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-21 22:03 virtio-9p-test.c:300:v9fs_req_recv: assertion failed (hdr.id == id): (7 == 73) Cole Robinson
2020-11-23 13:17 ` Greg Kurz
2020-11-23 13:48 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-11-23 14:28 ` Greg Kurz
2020-11-23 19:45 ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2020-11-24 13:25 ` Cole Robinson
2020-11-24 13:37 ` Christian Schoenebeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13275468.fAp1jBoSgB@silver \
--to=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=crobinso@redhat.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.