From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsyhr-000557-10 for bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:36:15 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q12FSEL7008137; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:28:14 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06622-10; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:28:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q12FS3Bs008116 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:28:05 GMT Message-ID: <1328196487.13744.193.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Shane Wang Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:28:07 +0000 In-Reply-To: <213886d7dc877c93686c896fe4584011bb4ce2ec.1328162622.git.shane.wang@intel.com> References: <213886d7dc877c93686c896fe4584011bb4ce2ec.1328162622.git.shane.wang@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [V2] bitbake: add description cache into cache_extra X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:36:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 14:05 +0800, Shane Wang wrote: > Enable bitbake to cache description into the extra cache file and Hob2 > will get its value for core-image-foo. > > Signed-off-by: Shane Wang > --- > bitbake/lib/bb/cache.py | 9 --------- > bitbake/lib/bb/cache_extra.py | 3 +++ > bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py | 2 ++ > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) I've merged this patch thanks. In future please work on better commit messages since this one doesn't mention the removal of the duplicate cache entries. When I took the patch I've tweaked the commit message in this case. Cheers, Richard