From: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com
Cc: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/11] [dm-thin] btree-remove - fix rebalancing of 3 nodes.
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:39:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1328200754-13642-6-git-send-email-ejt@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328200754-13642-1-git-send-email-ejt@redhat.com>
When we remove an entry from a node we sometimes rebalance with it's
neighbours. This wasn't being done correctly.
---
drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-remove.c | 174 +++++++++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-remove.c b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-remove.c
index 8576d56..aa71e23 100644
--- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-remove.c
+++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-remove.c
@@ -128,18 +128,9 @@ static void delete_at(struct node *n, unsigned index)
n->header.nr_entries = cpu_to_le32(nr_entries - 1);
}
-static unsigned del_threshold(struct node *n)
-{
- return le32_to_cpu(n->header.max_entries) / 3;
-}
-
static unsigned merge_threshold(struct node *n)
{
- /*
- * The extra one is because we know we're potentially going to
- * delete an entry.
- */
- return 2 * (le32_to_cpu(n->header.max_entries) / 3) + 1;
+ return le32_to_cpu(n->header.max_entries) / 3;
}
struct child {
@@ -188,6 +179,15 @@ static int exit_child(struct dm_btree_info *info, struct child *c)
static void shift(struct node *left, struct node *right, int count)
{
+ uint32_t nr_left = le32_to_cpu(left->header.nr_entries);
+ uint32_t nr_right = le32_to_cpu(right->header.nr_entries);
+ uint32_t max_entries = le32_to_cpu(left->header.max_entries);
+ uint32_t r_max_entries = le32_to_cpu(right->header.max_entries);
+
+ BUG_ON(max_entries != r_max_entries);
+ BUG_ON(nr_left - count > max_entries);
+ BUG_ON(nr_right + count > max_entries);
+
if (!count)
return;
@@ -199,13 +199,8 @@ static void shift(struct node *left, struct node *right, int count)
node_shift(right, count);
}
- left->header.nr_entries =
- cpu_to_le32(le32_to_cpu(left->header.nr_entries) - count);
- BUG_ON(le32_to_cpu(left->header.nr_entries) > le32_to_cpu(left->header.max_entries));
-
- right->header.nr_entries =
- cpu_to_le32(le32_to_cpu(right->header.nr_entries) + count);
- BUG_ON(le32_to_cpu(right->header.nr_entries) > le32_to_cpu(right->header.max_entries));
+ left->header.nr_entries = cpu_to_le32(nr_left - count);
+ right->header.nr_entries = cpu_to_le32(nr_right + count);
}
static void __rebalance2(struct dm_btree_info *info, struct node *parent,
@@ -215,8 +210,9 @@ static void __rebalance2(struct dm_btree_info *info, struct node *parent,
struct node *right = r->n;
uint32_t nr_left = le32_to_cpu(left->header.nr_entries);
uint32_t nr_right = le32_to_cpu(right->header.nr_entries);
+ unsigned threshold = 2 * merge_threshold(left) + 1;
- if (nr_left + nr_right <= merge_threshold(left)) {
+ if (nr_left + nr_right < threshold) {
/*
* Merge
*/
@@ -234,9 +230,6 @@ static void __rebalance2(struct dm_btree_info *info, struct node *parent,
* Rebalance.
*/
unsigned target_left = (nr_left + nr_right) / 2;
- unsigned shift_ = nr_left - target_left;
- BUG_ON(le32_to_cpu(left->header.max_entries) <= nr_left - shift_);
- BUG_ON(le32_to_cpu(right->header.max_entries) <= nr_right + shift_);
shift(left, right, nr_left - target_left);
*key_ptr(parent, r->index) = right->keys[0];
}
@@ -272,6 +265,84 @@ static int rebalance2(struct shadow_spine *s, struct dm_btree_info *info,
return exit_child(info, &right);
}
+/*
+ * We dump as many entries from center as possible into left, then the rest
+ * in right, then rebalance2. This wastes some cpu, but I want something
+ * simple atm.
+ */
+static void delete_center_node(struct dm_btree_info *info, struct node *parent,
+ struct child *l, struct child *c, struct child *r,
+ struct node *left, struct node *center, struct node *right,
+ uint32_t nr_left, uint32_t nr_center, uint32_t nr_right)
+{
+ uint32_t max_entries = le32_to_cpu(left->header.max_entries);
+ unsigned shift = min(max_entries - nr_left, nr_center);
+
+ BUG_ON(nr_left + shift > max_entries);
+ node_copy(left, center, -shift);
+ left->header.nr_entries = cpu_to_le32(nr_left + shift);
+
+ if (shift != nr_center) {
+ shift = nr_center - shift;
+ BUG_ON((nr_right + shift) > max_entries);
+ node_shift(right, shift);
+ node_copy(center, right, shift);
+ right->header.nr_entries = cpu_to_le32(nr_right + shift);
+ }
+ *key_ptr(parent, r->index) = right->keys[0];
+
+ delete_at(parent, c->index);
+ r->index--;
+
+ dm_tm_dec(info->tm, dm_block_location(c->block));
+ __rebalance2(info, parent, l, r);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Redistributes entries among 3 sibling nodes.
+ */
+static void redistribute3(struct dm_btree_info *info, struct node *parent,
+ struct child *l, struct child *c, struct child *r,
+ struct node *left, struct node *center, struct node *right,
+ uint32_t nr_left, uint32_t nr_center, uint32_t nr_right)
+{
+ int s;
+ uint32_t max_entries = le32_to_cpu(left->header.max_entries);
+ unsigned target = (nr_left + nr_center + nr_right) / 3;
+ BUG_ON(target > max_entries);
+
+ if (nr_left < nr_right) {
+ s = nr_left - target;
+
+ if (s < 0 && nr_center < -s) {
+ /* not enough in central node */
+ shift(left, center, nr_center);
+ s = nr_center - target;
+ shift(left, right, s);
+ nr_right += s;
+ } else
+ shift(left, center, s);
+
+ shift(center, right, target - nr_right);
+
+ } else {
+ s = target - nr_right;
+ if (s > 0 && nr_center < s) {
+ /* not enough in central node */
+ shift(center, right, nr_center);
+ s = target - nr_center;
+ shift(left, right, s);
+ nr_left -= s;
+ } else
+ shift(center, right, s);
+
+ shift(left, center, nr_left - target);
+ }
+
+ *key_ptr(parent, c->index) = center->keys[0];
+ *key_ptr(parent, r->index) = right->keys[0];
+}
+
static void __rebalance3(struct dm_btree_info *info, struct node *parent,
struct child *l, struct child *c, struct child *r)
{
@@ -282,62 +353,18 @@ static void __rebalance3(struct dm_btree_info *info, struct node *parent,
uint32_t nr_left = le32_to_cpu(left->header.nr_entries);
uint32_t nr_center = le32_to_cpu(center->header.nr_entries);
uint32_t nr_right = le32_to_cpu(right->header.nr_entries);
- uint32_t max_entries = le32_to_cpu(left->header.max_entries);
- unsigned target;
+ unsigned threshold = merge_threshold(left) * 4 + 1;
BUG_ON(left->header.max_entries != center->header.max_entries);
BUG_ON(center->header.max_entries != right->header.max_entries);
- if (((nr_left + nr_center + nr_right) / 2) < merge_threshold(center)) {
- /*
- * Delete center node:
- *
- * We dump as many entries from center as possible into
- * left, then the rest in right, then rebalance2. This
- * wastes some cpu, but I want something simple atm.
- */
- unsigned shift = min(max_entries - nr_left, nr_center);
-
- BUG_ON(nr_left + shift > max_entries);
- node_copy(left, center, -shift);
- left->header.nr_entries = cpu_to_le32(nr_left + shift);
-
- if (shift != nr_center) {
- shift = nr_center - shift;
- BUG_ON((nr_right + shift) >= max_entries);
- node_shift(right, shift);
- node_copy(center, right, shift);
- right->header.nr_entries = cpu_to_le32(nr_right + shift);
- }
- *key_ptr(parent, r->index) = right->keys[0];
-
- delete_at(parent, c->index);
- r->index--;
-
- dm_tm_dec(info->tm, dm_block_location(c->block));
- __rebalance2(info, parent, l, r);
-
- return;
- }
-
- /*
- * Rebalance
- */
- target = (nr_left + nr_center + nr_right) / 3;
- BUG_ON(target > max_entries);
-
- /*
- * Adjust the left node
- */
- shift(left, center, nr_left - target);
-
- /*
- * Adjust the right node
- */
- shift(center, right, target - nr_right);
- *key_ptr(parent, c->index) = center->keys[0];
- *key_ptr(parent, r->index) = right->keys[0];
+ if ((nr_left + nr_center + nr_right) < threshold)
+ delete_center_node(info, parent, l, c, r, left, center, right,
+ nr_left, nr_center, nr_right);
+ else
+ redistribute3(info, parent, l, c, r, left, center, right,
+ nr_left, nr_center, nr_right);
}
static int rebalance3(struct shadow_spine *s, struct dm_btree_info *info,
@@ -441,9 +468,6 @@ static int rebalance_children(struct shadow_spine *s,
if (r)
return r;
- if (child_entries > del_threshold(n))
- return 0;
-
has_left_sibling = i > 0;
has_right_sibling = i < (le32_to_cpu(n->header.nr_entries) - 1);
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-02 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-02 16:39 [PATCH 00/11] Latest dm-thin patches Joe Thornber
2012-02-02 16:39 ` [PATCH 01/11] Unlock the superblock on an error path for new metadata dev creation Joe Thornber
2012-02-02 16:39 ` [PATCH 02/11] Remove redundant arg from value_ptr() Joe Thornber
2012-02-02 16:39 ` [PATCH 03/11] [PATCH 18/19] [dm-thin] [bio prison] Don't use the bi_next field for the holder of a cell Joe Thornber
2012-02-07 23:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-02-10 14:55 ` Joe Thornber
2012-02-10 18:03 ` [PATCH 04/12 v2] dm thin: don't " Mike Snitzer
2012-02-02 16:39 ` [PATCH 04/11] [PATCH 15/19] [dm-thin] dm_thin_remove_block() wasn't decrementing the mapped_blocks counter Joe Thornber
2012-02-02 16:39 ` Joe Thornber [this message]
2012-02-02 16:39 ` [PATCH 06/11] Remove entries from the ref_count tree if they're no longer needed Joe Thornber
2012-02-02 16:39 ` [PATCH 07/11] [dm-thin] Commit every second to prevent too much of a position building up Joe Thornber
2012-02-07 16:53 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-02-07 23:00 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-02-10 14:48 ` Joe Thornber
2012-02-10 14:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2012-02-02 16:39 ` [PATCH 08/11] [dm-thin] Add support for external origins Joe Thornber
2012-02-02 16:39 ` [PATCH 09/11] [dm-thin] Discard support part 1 Joe Thornber
2012-02-02 16:39 ` [PATCH 10/11] [dm-thin] Add support for REQ_DISCARD Joe Thornber
2012-02-10 18:08 ` [PATCH 12/12 v2] dm thin: add discard support Mike Snitzer
2012-02-02 16:39 ` [PATCH 11/11] [dm-thin] some tidy ups of the __open_device() error path (Mike Snitzer) Joe Thornber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1328200754-13642-6-git-send-email-ejt@redhat.com \
--to=ejt@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.