From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Venki Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu,
robert.richter@amd.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf: perf sched warning possibly due to clock granularity on AMD
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:51:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1328601068.2482.46.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABeCy1ZH_BQhoSegeyBnY0XkjL9afm5=onKrmt9SApufCWgs3A@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 13:19 -0800, Venki Pallipadi wrote:
>
> Yes. If these two flags are set, TSC should be consistent and sched_clock_stable
> could be set and it will be reset if there is a call to mark_tsc_unstable().
Only trouble is that sched_clock_cpu() et al. will jump when you flip
sched_clock_stable to 0 after you started using it.. its something we
might want to fix.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-07 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-06 13:25 [BUG] perf: perf sched warning possibly due to clock granularity on AMD Stephane Eranian
2012-02-06 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-06 14:31 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-06 17:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-02-06 15:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-06 16:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-06 16:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-06 16:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-06 20:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-06 20:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-06 20:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-06 21:19 ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-07 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-02-07 8:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-07 9:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-02-07 9:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-07 12:08 ` [PATCH] x86, AMD: Set sched_clock_stable Borislav Petkov
2012-02-15 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-07 19:43 ` [tip:perf/core] x86/sched/perf/AMD: " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2012-02-08 15:07 ` [BUG] perf: perf sched warning possibly due to clock granularity on AMD Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-08 15:10 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-08 15:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-08 15:23 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-18 16:50 ` [PATCH] perf tools: Fix ordering with unstable tsc Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-22 15:35 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-22 15:39 ` David Ahern
2012-03-05 18:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-03-14 19:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-03-14 20:07 ` David Ahern
2012-03-22 0:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-03-22 15:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1328601068.2482.46.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.