From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Extend mwait idle to optimize away IPIs when possible
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:19:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1328901567.25989.51.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1328560933-3037-1-git-send-email-venki@google.com>
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 12:42 -0800, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> smp_call_function_single and ttwu_queue_remote sends unconditional IPI
> to target CPU. However, if the target CPU is in mwait based idle, we can
> do IPI-less wakeups using the magical powers of monitor-mwait.
So I was thinking, why not change native_smp_send_reschedule() and
native_send_call_func_single_ipi() and keep the change entirely inside
the arch?
Ideally its only APIC/idle that know about this detail, the scheduler
(or other consumers) really don't care about how the other cpu comes to
run the callback.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-10 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-06 20:42 [RFC] Extend mwait idle to optimize away IPIs when possible Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-06 21:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-06 21:26 ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-07 0:26 ` David Daney
2012-02-07 1:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-07 1:34 ` David Daney
2012-02-07 1:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-07 2:03 ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-07 2:24 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-02-07 21:39 ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-08 6:51 ` Yong Zhang
2012-02-08 23:28 ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-09 2:18 ` Yong Zhang
2012-02-10 2:17 ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-13 5:27 ` Yong Zhang
2012-02-10 19:19 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-02-11 2:11 ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-11 3:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-13 5:34 ` Yong Zhang
2012-02-14 13:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-15 1:39 ` Yong Zhang
2012-02-15 2:32 ` Venki Pallipadi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1328901567.25989.51.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=adurbin@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.