From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@freescale.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/85xx: fix problem that prevents PHYS_64BIT from configurable
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:10:33 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1329513033.3980.1.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOZdJXWQzxWXhU_4WmeKXx1mfTxGQx=-JZx0AkZcF7CmRrp1gQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 16:22 +0000, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> Was this a Freescale internal decision, or is this a generic 85xx
> decision?
>
> For the record, I'm in favor in leaving out support for 32-bit address
> map in the upstream kernel, and having it be an option on the SDK
> only. However, in order to do that, we cannot have "select
> PHYS_64BIT" in the Kconfigs. It needs to be in the defconfigs
> instead. Putting it in the defconfig will eliminate the need to have
> it in every Kconfig block, so I think that's an improvement.
>
> Then the SDK can include a defconfig that does not have PHYS_64BIT
> defined. And the SDK can include 32-bit U-Boots and 32-bit device
> trees for any board where Freescale determines there is a need.
>
> I think Leo's patch simplifies things for everyone.
Sorry, I fail to see how... it basically makes all those boards
non-functional even when enabled...
What's wrong with the current scheme ?
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-17 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-16 12:10 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/85xx: fix problem that prevents PHYS_64BIT from configurable Li Yang
2012-02-16 12:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/85xx: add a 36-bit corenet default config Li Yang
2012-02-16 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/85xx: fix problem that prevents PHYS_64BIT from configurable Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-16 15:57 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-17 1:27 ` Kumar Gala
2012-02-17 4:32 ` Li Yang-R58472
2012-02-17 8:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-02-17 16:22 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-02-17 21:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2012-02-17 21:17 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-17 23:01 ` Timur Tabi
2012-02-18 0:56 ` Scott Wood
2012-02-18 2:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-02-20 20:30 ` Scott Wood
2012-02-17 8:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1329513033.3980.1.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=B04825@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=r58472@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.