From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH 08 of 10] libxl: Implement libxl_sched_credit_param_[gs]et Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:56:16 +0000 Message-ID: <1329846976.2196.114.camel@elijah> References: <20291.55722.928406.510062@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20291.55722.928406.510062@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: George Dunlap , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 17:51 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > George Dunlap writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 08 of 10] libxl: Implement libxl_sched_credit_param_[gs]et"): > > Implement functions to set credit scheduler global parameters. > > Again, just some niggles: > > > +int libxl_sched_credit_param_get(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t poolid, libxl_sched_credit_param *scinfo) > > Long line here and in _set. > > Shouldn't this be "params" rather than "param" since it sets several > parameters ? Hmm, I suppose so. I think I accidentally said "param" because I originally wrote the patch series, the structure actually only contained one parameter. Then I thought I might as well do both at the same time, but didn't have to re-write this patch. :-) -George