From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S0I2m-0004XU-LI for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:40:04 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1MJVifJ000448 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:31:44 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32559-02 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:31:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1MJVc6s000442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:31:39 GMT Message-ID: <1329939097.32110.9.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:31:37 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1329912732.20261.110.camel@ted> <1329932828.32110.6.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for task-core-basic: libusb-compat (>= 0.1.3) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:40:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 13:46 -0500, Brandon Stafford wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > If you look at the tmp/deploy/ipk/*/Packages index file, you should see > > the dependencies of each package listed. It would be interesting to see > > if something is depending on "libusb-compat". If there is something I'd > > be tempted to try running "bitbake xxx -c cleansstate" and rebuilding > > that specific recipe. > > Victory! > > Looking at the Packages file, it appears that gnupg depends on libusb-compat. > > I then ran this series of commands: > > bitbake gnupg -c cleansstate > bitbake -c clean core-image-basic > bitbake core-image-basic > > These tasks all completed successfully. Thank you, Richard, for taking > the time to point me in the right direction. > > One last question-- somehow, the first build of gnupg was expecting to > find libusb-compat by the wrong name. This was cached in sstate, and a > subsequent build fixed it. Why would it work the second time if the > recipe was unchanged? That is a question I'd love to have the answer to. Something went wrong but I don't know what. If you had the old sstate package, it would have been interesting to compare the old and new ones but you've probably deleted that now :(. If you do still have them I'd be very interested in a copy of the two files. Was this with master or the 2011-1 release branch (or are you using poky and one of its release branches)? Cheers, Richard