From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Kent Subject: Re: compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:29:18 +0800 Message-ID: <1329978558.25314.0.camel@perseus.themaw.net> References: <20120221.221609.218135609185671883.davem@davemloft.net> <1329889428.2193.45.camel@perseus.themaw.net> <1329890027.2193.48.camel@perseus.themaw.net> <1329890251.2193.50.camel@perseus.themaw.net> <1329903139.2193.66.camel@perseus.themaw.net> <1329961703.2244.8.camel@perseus.themaw.net> <1329962085.2244.10.camel@perseus.themaw.net> <1329963683.2244.19.camel@perseus.themaw.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=themaw.net; h= message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; s=mesmtp; bh=gtO3OhNSIjkLlQX9INDHKVfp+38=; b=tgPIwiOLqUd4XIhaJrBwqC4xrwT1 J6GqW1V/QYlEVq35SQPKEdABZmcWm9umxKzMzkjYxk19Eem4Z9BalIlQxTXESwtY bmNkjoN6F7qVlV/+x1/eDfB4QCZqwOPs2EOk7qK4Tjcm9hDxmsHU9kGefGYrLDle 64H7E8xvjJcBuc8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date :in-reply-to:references:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; s=smtpout; bh=gtO3OhNSIjkLlQX9INDHKVfp+38=; b=kGt qgwyDuShnDF3SwdnFueaYFiMQ6Ya+cyjuvrQOrR2dTMKeGtvP0noagDD3z7KZuHl HBQvmhFBBR2dRx9m7pFKnOSruLSvEZFNxAf7L8nHfJrqB7nxn5aabCowSROx6ILm AXr9g5OByrwuNMDTUbvBJI2/+8s6VgxV35NHA4WE= In-Reply-To: <1329963683.2244.19.camel@perseus.themaw.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Thomas Meyer Cc: David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , autofs@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Al Viro On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 10:21 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:54 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:48 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 08:12 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Oh, DOH ... > > > > > > > > > > The process mounting the autofs mount is passing the pipe it will use > > > > > for communication via a mount option so we can do this right in > > > > > fill_super. > > > > > > > > No, we really cannot. > > > > > > Sorry, I think your wrong this time. > > > > On second thought, I suppose other user space users don't "have" to use > > mount(2) .... > > Thomas, what does systemd use to mount the autofs mounts that it uses? Mmm ... AFAICS systemd uses mount(2) so that looks OK too. Ian