From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>,
Shreyas Bhatewara <sbhatewara@vmware.com>,
Jongman Heo <jongman.heo@samsung.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Scott J. Goldman" <scottjg@vmware.com>,
VMware PV-Drivers <pv-drivers@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: Re: WARNING: at kernel/softirq.c:159 _local_bh_enable_ip+0x35/0x71()
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:22:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1330003354.11248.9.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329998028.15610.14.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 12:53 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Hmm, I am not sure we still need local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() in
> kmap_skb_frag()/ kunmap_skb_frag() anymore after commit 3e4d3af501ccc
> (mm: stack based kmap_atomic() )
The only thing to consider is keeping the total stack size under
control, this is somewhat non-trivial since its non-obvious what all
nests.
That said, you're probably right, and we do have a WARN in there
(dependent on CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM) that yells if we exceed the
available stack size.
The more 'interesting' exercise is determining a better upper bound on
the stack size and updating kmap_types.h accordingly.
> diff --git a/net/core/kmap_skb.h b/net/core/kmap_skb.h
> index 81e1ed7..06be5ee 100644
> --- a/net/core/kmap_skb.h
> +++ b/net/core/kmap_skb.h
> @@ -2,18 +2,10 @@
>
> static inline void *kmap_skb_frag(const skb_frag_t *frag)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
> - BUG_ON(in_irq());
> -
> - local_bh_disable();
> -#endif
> return kmap_atomic(skb_frag_page(frag), KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> }
>
> static inline void kunmap_skb_frag(void *vaddr)
> {
> kunmap_atomic(vaddr, KM_SKB_DATA_SOFTIRQ);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
> - local_bh_enable();
> -#endif
> }
The nicer patch would of course be a patch that does:
s/kunmap_skb_frag/kunmap_atomic/
s/kmap_skb_frag(\([^)]*\))/kmap_atomic(skb_frag_page(\1))/
There is no need to retain the KM_* argument and the 'helper' functions
are quite pointless at that point.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-23 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-22 1:03 Re: WARNING: at kernel/softirq.c:159 _local_bh_enable_ip+0x35/0x71() Jongman Heo
2012-02-23 10:42 ` Francois Romieu
2012-02-23 11:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-23 13:22 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-02-23 14:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-23 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-23 20:08 ` David Miller
2012-02-29 8:18 ` Shreyas Bhatewara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1330003354.11248.9.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jongman.heo@samsung.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pv-drivers@vmware.com \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
--cc=sbhatewara@vmware.com \
--cc=scottjg@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.