All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Reduce the number of retries whilst reading EDIDs
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:17:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1330096655.26569.22.camel@atropine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyAUgY5BBLA+eVF4bFTFkooxQneKE-0BWy1nrjUni=vxg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 995 bytes --]

On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 12:15 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> Btw, clearly X does *not* cache the EDID results, at least not for
> this case. So the explicit xrandr example is probably pretty close to
> what wine does. Maybe the proper fix is to just make X.org force
> caching when clients do this (because it's definitely X that does the
> drm_mode_getconnector() thing - xrandr itself spends zero time on
> this, it just does an X request and waits for the result).

RANDR exposes two requests here for a reason.  We used to only have
RRGetScreenResources which always pulled data afresh.  We added
RRGetScreenResourcesCurrent to get the cached version.  If you want
xrandr(1) to use the latter say xrandr --current.  Arguably xrandr
should do things the other way around and require you to say --reprobe
or something.

Even then, the kernel should cache if it can.  And any competent
hardware has plug interrupts on DP and DVI, so we really should get this
right.

- ajax

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-24 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-23 16:30 responsiveness: newer kernels causing lagging and blocking Stephan Bärwolf
2012-02-23 17:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 17:26   ` Stephan Bärwolf
2012-02-23 17:21 ` Chris Wilson
2012-02-23 17:29   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 17:31     ` Dave Airlie
2012-02-23 18:15   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 19:52     ` [PATCH] drm: Reduce the number of retries whilst reading EDIDs Chris Wilson
2012-02-23 19:52       ` Chris Wilson
2012-02-23 20:15       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 20:36         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 21:36         ` Eugeni Dodonov
2012-02-23 21:40           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-24 15:17         ` Adam Jackson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1330096655.26569.22.camel@atropine \
    --to=ajax@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=eugeni.dodonov@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.