All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] gdb-cross-canadian: use NATIVESDK paths as it happens to be here
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:42:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1330184551.13788.39.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120225131218.GP3769@jama.jama.net>

On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 14:12 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 01:02:48AM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > I seem to remember strongly disagreeing with:
> > 
> > SDK_NAME = "oecore-${SDK_ARCH}-${TARGET_ARCH}"
> > SDKPATH = "/usr/local/${SDK_NAME}"
> > 
> > that is in bitbake.conf but probably wasn't able to articulate why at
> > the time. You'll note that poky.conf does:
> > 
> > SDK_VERSION := "${@'${DISTRO_VERSION}'.replace('snapshot-${DATE}','snapshot')}"
> > SDK_NAME = "${DISTRO}-${TCLIBC}-${SDK_ARCH}-${TARGET_ARCH}"
> > SDKPATH = "/opt/${DISTRO}/${SDK_VERSION}"
> > 
> > so the SDKPATH is not dependent on TARGET_ARCH. It doesn't need to
> > depend on SDK_ARCH either although that is not the problematic part
> > here.
> > 
> > If you think about what is happening, bitbake will reuse the sstate
> > files for each nativesdk, they are meant to be equivalent for each
> > SDKMACHINE. If you hardcode TARGET_ARCH into the path, they are not.
> 
> I'll update my first patch to remove TARGET_ARCH, I'm testing
> SDKPATH = "/usr/local/${SDK_NAME_PREFIX}"
> now, then we still have to deal with different toplevel SYSROOT (if we
> want to use STAGING_LIBDIR etc).

Ok, we need to do this one step at a time :)

> x86_64-nativesdk-oesdk-linux (python-nativesdk)
> x86_64-oesdk-linux-nativesdk (gdb-cross-canadian-*)

This looks broken, the python-nativesdk looks right, the cross-canadian
one looks wrong.

Thinking further, cross-candian is never used from staging. Its
therefore entirely possible the path is just totally broken in
cross-canadian.bbclass. We can probably do something like:

-STAGING_DIR_HOST = "${STAGING_DIR}/${HOST_SYS}-nativesdk"
+STAGING_DIR_HOST = "${STAGING_DIR}/${HOST_ARCH}-nativesdk${HOST_VENDOR}-${HOST_OS}"

> And that looks even more like another wrong variable to me, but as I've
> said in 1st thread (SDK confusion) I normaly don't build SDKs so maybe
> there are hidden reasons to stage them in different dirs.
> 
> I can use Eric's
> ${STAGING_DIR}/${HOST_ARCH}-nativesdk${HOST_VENDOR}-${HOST_OS}
> to look into right sysroot, but maybe it's again not right direction.
> 
> > So I'd say that SDKPATH containing SDK_NAME is clearly bogus and
> > TARGET_ARCH needs to be removed in somehow at the very least. Fix that
> > and your problems should go away. 
> 
> Not really but it's getting better :).
> 
> > The patches you're sending don't fix the root problem though.
> 
> Originaly they were meant mostly to show the difference between
> nativesdk and cross-canadian paths.. so I'm not much surprised :).

Hopefully with the above we can resolve this!

Cheers,

Richard




  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-25 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-13 15:40 [PATCH 0/4] PR bumps for missing libz.la, resent gdb python support with fix Martin Jansa
2012-02-13 15:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] gdb-cross-canadian: build gdb with python support Martin Jansa
2012-02-13 15:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] gdb-cross-canadian: use NATIVESDK paths as it happens to be here Martin Jansa
2012-02-13 16:11   ` [PATCH] gdb-cross-canadian: bump PR Martin Jansa
2012-02-17 22:36   ` [PATCH 2/4] gdb-cross-canadian: use NATIVESDK paths as it happens to be here Saul Wold
2012-02-18 11:56     ` Martin Jansa
2012-02-18 14:01       ` Richard Purdie
2012-02-23  8:16         ` Martin Jansa
2012-02-23 10:27   ` Richard Purdie
2012-02-25  0:05     ` Martin Jansa
2012-02-25  1:02       ` Richard Purdie
2012-02-25 13:12         ` Martin Jansa
2012-02-25 15:42           ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2012-02-13 15:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] zlib: remove ldconfig call from install-libs Martin Jansa
2012-02-13 15:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] recipes: bump PR to rebuild .la files without libz.la Martin Jansa
2012-02-21 19:00   ` Steve Sakoman
2012-02-21 19:25   ` Steve Sakoman
2012-02-21 21:07     ` Khem Raj
2012-02-21 21:16       ` Steve Sakoman
2012-02-21 21:33         ` Phil Blundell
2012-02-21 21:39           ` Steve Sakoman
2012-02-21 21:45             ` Phil Blundell
2012-02-21 21:44         ` Paul Eggleton
2012-02-21 22:01           ` Steve Sakoman
2012-02-21 17:07 ` [PATCH 0/4] PR bumps for missing libz.la, resent gdb python support with fix Saul Wold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1330184551.13788.39.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.