From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Ronald Wahl <ronald.wahl@raritan.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Occasional truncated scan results
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:24:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1330442659.3368.13.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F4CEFA6.2090005@raritan.com>
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:15 +0100, Ronald Wahl wrote:
> >> Currently I implemented a heuristic that checks if some minimum space
> >> (currently 256 bytes) is still free _after_ adding a BSS and otherwise
> >> return -E2BIG so the user space can provide a larger buffer but this is
> >> a crappy hack.
> >>
> >> Can the code be changed in some way to more reliably detect if some data
> >> did not fit into the buffer and report this to user space?
> >
> > Unfortunately not. The maximum buffer size userspace can provide is
> > limited to 64k. In busy environments, this size can be exceeded. As a
> > result, if we do this, you can't get *any* scan results in such
> > environments. I believe the current code is almost the best we can do
> > for wireless extensions, but it may be possible to implement never
> > truncating a single BSS entry.
>
> My problem is not that the scan results are larger than 64k. The user
> space is coded so that it provides a small buffer that is doubled in
> size until the data fits into the buffer. But the kernel code does not
> always detect the case that the buffer is almost full and just starts
> skipping some data without notifying user space with E2BIG.
Ok. Yes, this could be fixed by making sure that a single BSS is
atomically written or not written -- probably simply by rolling back at
the end of the function if it didn't fit and returning an error etc. If
you wanted to work on this, I'd review & accept the patch, but I have no
intention whatsoever to do this myself :-)
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-28 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-28 14:29 Occasional truncated scan results Ronald Wahl
2012-02-28 14:42 ` Johannes Berg
2012-02-28 15:15 ` Ronald Wahl
2012-02-28 15:24 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2012-02-28 15:35 ` Ronald Wahl
2012-02-29 8:36 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1330442659.3368.13.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ronald.wahl@raritan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.