From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1330610112.28173.5.camel@rubik> From: Tim Waugh Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:55:12 +0000 In-Reply-To: <4F4F6D64.7030100@gmail.com> References: <1330600735.18587.3.camel@rubik> <4F4F6D64.7030100@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-szv5SgZitPNWv93uJQaw" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] pdftopdf List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Till Kamppeter Cc: Open Printing --=-szv5SgZitPNWv93uJQaw Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 13:36 +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote: > Tim, I did not know that. At least it links against libpoppler. >=20 > Otani-san, is there still code-duplication of XPDF or Poppler in the=20 > pdftopdf filter? Can this be avoided? >=20 > Tim, which version of pdftopdf are you looking at? I'm looking at the pdftopdf from cups-filters-1.0.2. $ grep -l 'Glyph & Cog' * P2PCharCodeToUnicode.cxx P2PCharCodeToUnicode.h P2PCMap.cxx P2PCMap.h P2PGfx.cxx P2PGfx.h parseargs.cxx parseargs.h These are from xpdf aren't they? Or copied from poppler? Tim. */ --=-szv5SgZitPNWv93uJQaw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUAT09/we7Fkar03pQsAQIPhAf/SWd5fwk0QobGSg1xJsBkaQtcrt6/WsTA 32kZEasi8S685v+4MGQthjUtVn2Hq0ooFNGr6s4X5jRvlhI0a2mCCSfUXZpk9lBg xON97/jY3b7nT0x3ZTYbjfJFD4lLIQB5dyDh81r7Q1+djyGICHpTeeBk7hIOd4ki EUPzEL0/AnzAVeDVdyexcu71lR75BpwtDZO7TluUnS9dzO8u1dy/IDgOe4WCSxdC KvTjOJAjs2wIHxeGlw8i7HOC1CVofthG5c/fTVjdn0opJURgxU/f11uWhUzJZXCO uwzyQLoKci9nseo8oGKEk8s0cSNWg0rBiB95pODvduuV9YSB29h2qA== =Gtog -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-szv5SgZitPNWv93uJQaw--