From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
andi.kleen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC patch] spindep: add cross cache lines checking
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 13:48:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1330926495.18835.53.camel@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1330926234.18835.51.camel@debian>
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 13:43 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 11:24 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> > Oops.
> > Sorry, the patch is not tested well! will update it later.
resent for correct Thomas's e-mail address. Sorry.
>
> corrected version:
> ==========
> >From 28745c1970a61a1420d388660cd9dcc619cd38ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:03:35 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] lockdep: add cross cache lines checking
>
> Modern x86 CPU won't hold whole memory bus when executing 'lock'
> prefixed instructions unless the instruction destination is crossing 2
> cache lines. If so, it is disaster of system performance.
>
> Actually if the lock is not in the 'packed' structure, gcc places it
> safely under x86 arch. But seems add this checking in
> CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is harmless.
>
> Inspired-by: Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/cache.h | 2 +
> include/asm-generic/cache.h | 2 +
> lib/spinlock_debug.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cache.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cache.h
> index 48f99f1..63c2316 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cache.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cache.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
> #define L1_CACHE_SHIFT (CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT)
> #define L1_CACHE_BYTES (1 << L1_CACHE_SHIFT)
>
> +#define L1_CACHE_SIZE_MASK (~(L1_CACHE_BYTES - 1))
> +
> #define __read_mostly __attribute__((__section__(".data..read_mostly")))
>
> #define INTERNODE_CACHE_SHIFT CONFIG_X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_SHIFT
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/cache.h b/include/asm-generic/cache.h
> index 1bfcfe5..6f8eb29 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/cache.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/cache.h
> @@ -9,4 +9,6 @@
> #define L1_CACHE_SHIFT 5
> #define L1_CACHE_BYTES (1 << L1_CACHE_SHIFT)
>
> +#define L1_CACHE_SIZE_MASK (~(L1_CACHE_BYTES - 1))
> +
> #endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_CACHE_H */
> diff --git a/lib/spinlock_debug.c b/lib/spinlock_debug.c
> index 5f3eacd..938a145 100644
> --- a/lib/spinlock_debug.c
> +++ b/lib/spinlock_debug.c
> @@ -13,41 +13,9 @@
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
>
> -void __raw_spin_lock_init(raw_spinlock_t *lock, const char *name,
> - struct lock_class_key *key)
> -{
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> - /*
> - * Make sure we are not reinitializing a held lock:
> - */
> - debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock));
> - lockdep_init_map(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0);
> -#endif
> - lock->raw_lock = (arch_spinlock_t)__ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
> - lock->magic = SPINLOCK_MAGIC;
> - lock->owner = SPINLOCK_OWNER_INIT;
> - lock->owner_cpu = -1;
> -}
> -
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(__raw_spin_lock_init);
> -
> -void __rwlock_init(rwlock_t *lock, const char *name,
> - struct lock_class_key *key)
> -{
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> - /*
> - * Make sure we are not reinitializing a held lock:
> - */
> - debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock));
> - lockdep_init_map(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0);
> -#endif
> - lock->raw_lock = (arch_rwlock_t) __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
> - lock->magic = RWLOCK_MAGIC;
> - lock->owner = SPINLOCK_OWNER_INIT;
> - lock->owner_cpu = -1;
> -}
> -
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(__rwlock_init);
> +#define is_cross_lines(p) \
> + (((unsigned long)(p) & L1_CACHE_SIZE_MASK) != \
> + (((unsigned long)(p) + sizeof(*p) - 1) & L1_CACHE_SIZE_MASK)) \
>
> static void spin_dump(raw_spinlock_t *lock, const char *msg)
> {
> @@ -296,3 +264,41 @@ void do_raw_write_unlock(rwlock_t *lock)
> debug_write_unlock(lock);
> arch_write_unlock(&lock->raw_lock);
> }
> +
> +void __raw_spin_lock_init(raw_spinlock_t *lock, const char *name,
> + struct lock_class_key *key)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> + /*
> + * Make sure we are not reinitializing a held lock:
> + */
> + debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock));
> + lockdep_init_map(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0);
> + SPIN_BUG_ON(is_cross_lines(&lock->raw_lock), lock,
> + "!!! the lock cross cache lines !!!");
> +#endif
> + lock->raw_lock = (arch_spinlock_t)__ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
> + lock->magic = SPINLOCK_MAGIC;
> + lock->owner = SPINLOCK_OWNER_INIT;
> + lock->owner_cpu = -1;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__raw_spin_lock_init);
> +
> +void __rwlock_init(rwlock_t *lock, const char *name,
> + struct lock_class_key *key)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> + /*
> + * Make sure we are not reinitializing a held lock:
> + */
> + debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock));
> + lockdep_init_map(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0);
> + RWLOCK_BUG_ON(is_cross_lines(&lock->raw_lock), lock,
> + "!!! the lock cross cache lines !!!");
> +#endif
> + lock->raw_lock = (arch_rwlock_t) __ARCH_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
> + lock->magic = RWLOCK_MAGIC;
> + lock->owner = SPINLOCK_OWNER_INIT;
> + lock->owner_cpu = -1;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__rwlock_init);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-05 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-05 3:20 [RFC patch] spin_lock: add cross cache lines checking Alex Shi
2012-03-05 3:24 ` Alex Shi
2012-03-05 5:43 ` [RFC patch] spindep: " Alex Shi
2012-03-05 5:48 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2012-03-05 9:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-05 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-06 6:13 ` Alex Shi
2012-03-06 6:18 ` Alex Shi
2012-03-06 9:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-07 8:23 ` Alex Shi
2012-03-07 11:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-07 13:13 ` Alex Shi
2012-03-07 13:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-08 2:21 ` Alex Shi
2012-03-08 7:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-09 1:20 ` Alex Shi
2012-03-08 2:30 ` Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1330926495.18835.53.camel@debian \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.