From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965292Ab2CGBih (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:38:37 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:52401 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964983Ab2CGBih convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:38:37 -0500 Message-ID: <1331084302.11248.338.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH bisected regression] sched: rebuild sched domains at suspend/resume From: Peter Zijlstra To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 02:38:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20120306204357.13169.90791.stgit@zurg> <1331067743.11248.333.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 16:54 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I do agree that reverting is probably safer at this point, but can we > get agreement on this? I agree with reverting, shoot it in the head :-) Do you want a git thingy?