From: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
dirk.brandewie@gmail.com, alan@linux.intel.com,
stable@kernel.org, Dan Hecht <dhecht@vmware.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, tsc: Skip refined tsc calibration on systems with reliable TSC.
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:05:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1331085930.8086.33.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331083933.2191.172.camel@work-vm>
Hi John,
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 17:32 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 18:19 -0800, Alok Kataria wrote:
> > [Oops forgot to copy LKML, now it is, sorry for the duplicates]
> >
> > While running the latest Linux as guest under VMware in highly
> > over-committed situations, we have seen cases when the refined TSC
> > algorithm fails to get a valid tsc_start value in
> > tsc_refine_calibration_work from multiple attempts. As a result the
> > kernel keeps on scheduling the tsc_irqwork task for later. Subsequently
> > after several attempts when it gets a valid start value it goes through
> > the refined calibration and either bails out or uses the new results.
> > Given that the kernel originally read the TSC frequency from the
> > platform, which is the best it can get, I don't think there is much
> > value in refining it.
> >
> > So IMO, for systems which get the TSC frequency from the platform we
> > should skip the refined tsc algorithm.
> >
> > We can use the TSC_RELIABLE cpu cap flag to detect this, right now it is
> > set only on VMware and for Moorestown Penwell both of which have there
> > own TSC calibration methods.
>
> So this looks ok to me, only one nit below...
>
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-02-21 17:31:01.000000000 -0800
> > +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-02-21 17:39:05.000000000 -0800
> > @@ -874,6 +874,13 @@ static void tsc_refine_calibration_work(
> > goto out;
> >
> > /*
> > + * Trust the results of the earlier calibration on systems
> > + * exporting a reliable TSC.
> > + */
> > + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE))
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + /*
>
> Instead of dropping out in the function called by the work-queue, why
> not just avoid scheduling the work-queue to begin with?
>
> The FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE isn't something that is set late, and needs the
> delay, right?
Right, but the reason I did it as part of work-queue was because on the
"out" path it still registered the tsc clocksource for us, the patch you
suggested doesn't do that. Please find below a patch on similar lines,
which registers the clocksource on RELIABLE_TSC systems, instead of
relying on irq_work to do that.
> Here's what I queued up, let me know if it looks ok to you and I'll push
> it on to Thomas.
>
> thanks
> -john
>
> From 50cd62f326fa3204763717c9808bdc29ba10512c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:19:55 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] x86, tsc: Skip refined tsc calibration on systems with reliable TSC.
>
> While running the latest Linux as guest under VMware in highly
> over-committed situations, we have seen cases when the refined TSC
> algorithm fails to get a valid tsc_start value in
> tsc_refine_calibration_work from multiple attempts. As a result the
> kernel keeps on scheduling the tsc_irqwork task for later. Subsequently
> after several attempts when it gets a valid start value it goes through
> the refined calibration and either bails out or uses the new results.
> Given that the kernel originally read the TSC frequency from the
> platform, which is the best it can get, I don't think there is much
> value in refining it.
>
> So for systems which get the TSC frequency from the platform we
> should skip the refined tsc algorithm.
>
> We can use the TSC_RELIABLE cpu cap flag to detect this, right now it is
> set only on VMware and for Moorestown Penwell both of which have there
> own TSC calibration methods.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
> Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
> Cc: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> [jstultz: Reworked to simply not schedule the refining work,
> rather then scheduling the work and bombing out later]
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> index a62c201..b7d4d33 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> @@ -932,6 +932,14 @@ static int __init init_tsc_clocksource(void)
> clocksource_tsc.rating = 0;
> clocksource_tsc.flags &= ~CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * Trust the results of the earlier calibration on systems
> + * exporting a reliable TSC.
> + */
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE))
> + return 0;
> +
> schedule_delayed_work(&tsc_irqwork, 0);
> return 0;
> }
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-02-21 17:25:35.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2012-03-06 17:56:00.000000000 -0800
@@ -938,6 +938,16 @@ static int __init init_tsc_clocksource(v
clocksource_tsc.rating = 0;
clocksource_tsc.flags &= ~CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS;
}
+
+ /*
+ * Trust the results of the earlier calibration on systems
+ * exporting a reliable TSC.
+ */
+ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE)) {
+ clocksource_register_khz(&clocksource_tsc, tsc_khz);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
schedule_delayed_work(&tsc_irqwork, 0);
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-07 2:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1329876964.10380.28.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com>
2012-02-22 2:19 ` [PATCH] x86, tsc: Skip refined tsc calibration on systems with reliable TSC Alok Kataria
2012-02-28 19:09 ` Alok Kataria
2012-03-07 1:32 ` john stultz
2012-03-07 2:05 ` Alok Kataria [this message]
2012-03-07 3:26 ` john stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1331085930.8086.33.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com \
--to=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dhecht@vmware.com \
--cc=dirk.brandewie@gmail.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.