From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: masterzorag <masterzorag@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spufs raises two exceptions
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:51:20 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1331092280.3105.5.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331092190.3105.3.camel@pasglop>
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 14:49 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 10:26 +0100, masterzorag wrote:
> > I'm running my test program, it uses all available spus to compute via
> > OpenCL
> > kernel 3.2.5 on a ps3
> > even on testing spu directly, it crashes
>
> I think the patch is not 100% right yet. Looking at the code, we
> have a real mess of who gets to clean what up here. This is an
> attempt at sorting things by having the mutex and dentry dropped
> in spufs_create() always. Can you give it a spin (untested):
>
> Al, I'm not familiar with the vfs, can you take a quick look ?
Better with the actual patch :-)
powerpc/cell: Fix locking in spufs_create()
The error path in spufs_create() could cause double unlocks
among other horrors. Clean it up.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Reported-by: masterzorag@gmail.com
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c
index d4a094c..63b4e43 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c
@@ -454,19 +454,16 @@ spufs_create_context(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry,
struct spu_gang *gang;
struct spu_context *neighbor;
- ret = -EPERM;
if ((flags & SPU_CREATE_NOSCHED) &&
- !capable(CAP_SYS_NICE))
- goto out_unlock;
+ !capable(CAP_SYa_NICE))
+ return -EPERM;
- ret = -EINVAL;
if ((flags & (SPU_CREATE_NOSCHED | SPU_CREATE_ISOLATE))
== SPU_CREATE_ISOLATE)
- goto out_unlock;
+ return -EINVAL;
- ret = -ENODEV;
if ((flags & SPU_CREATE_ISOLATE) && !isolated_loader)
- goto out_unlock;
+ return -ENODEV;
gang = NULL;
neighbor = NULL;
@@ -512,10 +509,6 @@ spufs_create_context(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry,
out_aff_unlock:
if (affinity)
mutex_unlock(&gang->aff_mutex);
-out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
-out:
- dput(dentry);
return ret;
}
@@ -585,11 +578,9 @@ static int spufs_create_gang(struct inode *inode,
struct dentry *dentry,
struct vfsmount *mnt, umode_t mode)
{
- int ret;
-
- ret = spufs_mkgang(inode, dentry, mode & S_IRWXUGO);
+ int ret = spufs_mkgang(inode, dentry, mode & S_IRWXUGO);
if (ret)
- goto out;
+ return ret;
/*
* get references for dget and mntget, will be released
@@ -600,10 +591,6 @@ static int spufs_create_gang(struct inode *inode,
int err = simple_rmdir(inode, dentry);
WARN_ON(err);
}
-
-out:
- mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
- dput(dentry);
return ret;
}
@@ -613,22 +600,21 @@ static struct file_system_type spufs_type;
long spufs_create(struct path *path, struct dentry *dentry,
unsigned int flags, umode_t mode, struct file *filp)
{
- int ret;
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
- ret = -EINVAL;
/* check if we are on spufs */
if (path->dentry->d_sb->s_type != &spufs_type)
- goto out;
+ goto fail;
/* don't accept undefined flags */
if (flags & (~SPU_CREATE_FLAG_ALL))
- goto out;
+ goto fail;
/* only threads can be underneath a gang */
if (path->dentry != path->dentry->d_sb->s_root) {
if ((flags & SPU_CREATE_GANG) ||
!SPUFS_I(path->dentry->d_inode)->i_gang)
- goto out;
+ goto fail;
}
mode &= ~current_umask();
@@ -640,12 +626,17 @@ long spufs_create(struct path *path, struct dentry *dentry,
ret = spufs_create_context(path->dentry->d_inode,
dentry, path->mnt, flags, mode,
filp);
- if (ret >= 0)
+ if (ret >= 0) {
+ /* We drop these before fsnotify */
+ mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
+ dput(dentry);
fsnotify_mkdir(path->dentry->d_inode, dentry);
- return ret;
-out:
- mutex_unlock(&path->dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ fail:
+ mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
+ dput(dentry);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/syscalls.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/syscalls.c
index 8591bb6..1a65ef2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/syscalls.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/syscalls.c
@@ -70,11 +70,8 @@ static long do_spu_create(const char __user *pathname, unsigned int flags,
ret = PTR_ERR(dentry);
if (!IS_ERR(dentry)) {
ret = spufs_create(&path, dentry, flags, mode, neighbor);
- mutex_unlock(&path.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
- dput(dentry);
path_put(&path);
}
-
return ret;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-07 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-06 9:26 [PATCH] spufs raises two exceptions masterzorag
2012-03-07 3:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-03-07 3:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2012-03-07 12:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-07 21:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-03-07 21:23 ` Al Viro
2012-03-07 22:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1331092280.3105.5.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=masterzorag@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.