From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by casper.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1S602l-0003Or-TC for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:39:40 +0000 Message-ID: <1331300518.29445.32.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [Resent with proper line wrap] Request for comments: UBI PEBs as a multiple of erase size From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Kevin Paul Herbert Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 15:41:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <6C6BF63D-5411-490C-BC7D-19227423B6BF@meraki.net> References: <40BCDFDF-F9C8-46C5-99F8-E56050E8B32C@meraki.net> <6C6BF63D-5411-490C-BC7D-19227423B6BF@meraki.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 22:21 -0700, Kevin Paul Herbert wrote: > [Sorry for the ugly lack of line-wrap... I thought I knew better. :-)] > > I came across a situation where I wanted to be able to use the same pre-built > (with UBI) image on two different FLASH devices, one of which having a > larger erase size than the other. I actually did not notice that the device > I was using had a different erase size, which caused UBI to quietly corrupt > my FLASH. Feel free to send a patch, sure. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy