From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1S6Oa7-00075M-Up for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:51:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44425) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6Oa5-000755-Ge for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:51:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6Oa3-0007nU-TC for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:51:41 -0500 Received: from spam1.wiktel.com ([69.89.207.151]:49476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6Oa3-0007mz-Nn for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:51:39 -0500 Received: from [172.16.0.253] (thief-pool2-121-14.mncable.net [24.225.121.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by spam1.wiktel.com (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id q2AFpYn0003343 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:51:34 -0600 Subject: Re: Remaining ZFS Changes for 2.00 (Was: Re: Freeze on 27 February) From: Richard Laager To: The development of GRUB 2 In-Reply-To: <4F5B597A.8030508@gmail.com> References: <4F43C25C.2040106@gmail.com> <1329888906.16648.134.camel@watermelon.coderich.net> <4F45DDF0.2090908@gmail.com> <1330033617.3895.26.camel@watermelon.coderich.net> <4F4AC782.1090402@gmail.com> <1330322499.2901.5.camel@watermelon.coderich.net> <4F4BC95C.5040706@gmail.com> <1330371970.2901.34.camel@watermelon.coderich.net> <1331247110.6821.26.camel@watermelon.coderich.net> <4F5B597A.8030508@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Z8yJhgntiT44T3iMnLOj" Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:51:34 -0600 Message-ID: <1331394694.23327.147.camel@watermelon.coderich.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-bounce-key: wiktel.com-1; rlaager@wiktel.com; 1331394694; H17CVNTMWelkWDmCGDhXknLysC0; X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 69.89.207.151 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:51:43 -0000 --=-Z8yJhgntiT44T3iMnLOj Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 14:39 +0100, Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinen= ko wrote: > Please, don't forget xen counterpart in the future. It's not the first > time I have to fix your patches for them I didn't realize the Linux code was duplicated for Xen. That seems sub-optimal. Can that be avoided somehow? --=20 Richard --=-Z8yJhgntiT44T3iMnLOj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk9beIYACgkQbfU6uV4fG86uFgCgjemRP/GPATrO7BL9EIrnMctq gvMAn1VuiEWzGNY/btA0Ak5+MnqwsT1K =porq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Z8yJhgntiT44T3iMnLOj--