From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tim.rpsys.net (93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.173.237]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF94E0059A for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2LMAgor006844; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:10:42 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06491-05; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:10:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2LMAZlW006838 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:10:37 GMT Message-ID: <1332367838.9740.208.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Denys Dmytriyenko Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:10:38 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20120321214515.GD6857@denix.org> References: <86ehsln0t7.fsf@coulee.tdb.com> <1332365246.9740.195.camel@ted> <20120321214515.GD6857@denix.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Marco Monguzzi , meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: question on meta-ti for yocto X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:10:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 17:45 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > That's not true. There are no hard dependencies on meta-angstrom any more. And > meta-oe is only needed to supply gcc-4.5 for now, until all the issues are > ironed out. > > I've been making numerous builds past few weeks with different combination of > layers and besides few bugs I need to fix for the distro-less configuration, > was quite successful getting meta-ti work with oe-core WITHOUT meta-angstrom! > > There are some systemd dependencies, but they are no longer hard ones. There > was discussion about moving beagle payload stuff off of meta-ti. But it should > no longer break things. I've been going by the information I see and the contents of the meta-ti README. Reading the above it looks like much progress is being made, things are changing and I really do appreciate that happening! > > The amount of confusion this is causing users is immense as we see from > > new users and experienced ones alike. Whilst I know people have nodded > > and agreed they're going to fix it, time goes on and we don't seem to > > make much progress. > > > > The biggest confusion factor out there at the moment is meta-ti, not > > poky and I'd like to ask politely for people to get their act together. > > See above, the work is being done. The first wave of people who complained > about those dependencies are now building their images. There are still > confused people, but we'll clear the message once all obstacles are resolved. Great, thanks! > Richard, Koen, please take your word-fight and name-calling offline! It's not > a proper place here. Thank you. Well said and I agree with you! :) The trouble is Koen keeps doing this and nobody in general replies. The lack of a reply can be seen as to condone what was said and its certainly leading to people getting more confused. I think a response was appropriate. I also do not mean to undermine the progress being made on meta-ti. I hadn't heard much for a while but it looks like things are moving forward and that is great to see. Cheers, Richard