From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Relax the need-mappable? flag for execbuffers Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:18:28 +0100 Message-ID: <1332695916_88768@CP5-2952> References: <1332694569-10295-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fireflyinternet.com (smtp.fireflyinternet.com [109.228.6.236]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C70B9E889 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:18:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cantiga.alporthouse.com (unverified [78.156.66.37]) by fireflyinternet.com (Firefly Internet SMTP) with ESMTP id 109301874-1500050 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:18:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1332694569-10295-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 17:56:09 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Since we now can rewrite relocation pointers using the CPU domain, for > those cases we do not need to force a mappable GTT allocation. Ok, Daniel pointed out that I'm sitting on the wrong tree and that we already have these patches pending. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre